What is the double pipe operator (||
)?
The double pipe operator (||
) is the logical OR
operator . In most languages it works the following way:
- If the first value is
false
, it checks the second value. If that's true
, it returns true
and if the second value is false
, it returns false
.
- If the first value is
true
, it always returns true
, no matter what the second value is.
So basically it works like this function:
function or(x, y) {
if (x) {
return true;
} else if (y) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
If you still don't understand, look at this table:
| true false
------+---------------
true | true true
false | true false
In other words, it's only false when both values are false.
How is it different in JavaScript?
JavaScript is a bit different, because it's a loosely typed language. In this case it means that you can use ||
operator with values that are not booleans. Though it makes no sense, you can use this operator with for example a function and an object:
(function(){}) || {}
What happens there?
If values are not boolean, JavaScript makes implicit conversion to boolean. It means that if the value is falsey (e.g. 0
, ""
, null
, undefined
(see also All falsey values in JavaScript)), it will be treated as false
; otherwise it's treated as true
.
So the above example should give true
, because empty function is truthy. Well, it doesn't. It returns the empty function. That's because JavaScript's ||
operator doesn't work as I wrote at the beginning. It works the following way:
- If the first value is falsey, it returns the second value.
- If the first value is truthy, it returns the first value.
Surprised? Actually, it's "compatible" with the traditional ||
operator. It could be written as following function:
function or(x, y) {
if (x) {
return x;
} else {
return y;
}
}
If you pass a truthy value as x
, it returns x
, that is, a truthy value. So if you use it later in if
clause:
(function(x, y) {
var eitherXorY = x || y;
if (eitherXorY) {
console.log("Either x or y is truthy.");
} else {
console.log("Neither x nor y is truthy");
}
}(true/*, undefined*/));
you get "Either x or y is truthy."
.
If x
was falsey, eitherXorY
would be y
. In this case you would get the "Either x or y is truthy."
if y
was truthy; otherwise you'd get "Neither x nor y is truthy"
.
The actual question
Now, when you know how ||
operator works, you can probably make out by yourself what does x = x || y
mean. If x
is truthy, x
is assigned to x
, so actually nothing happens; otherwise y
is assigned to x
. It is commonly used to define default parameters in functions. However, it is often considered a bad programming practice, because it prevents you from passing a falsey value (which is not necessarily undefined
or null
) as a parameter. Consider following example:
function badFunction(/* boolean */flagA) {
flagA = flagA || true;
console.log("flagA is set to " + (flagA ? "true" : "false"));
}
It looks valid at the first sight. However, what would happen if you passed false
as flagA
parameter (since it's boolean, i.e. can be true
or false
)? It would become true
. In this example, there is no way to set flagA
to false
.
It would be a better idea to explicitly check whether flagA
is undefined
, like that:
function goodFunction(/* boolean */flagA) {
flagA = typeof flagA !== "undefined" ? flagA : true;
console.log("flagA is set to " + (flagA ? "true" : "false"));
}
Though it's longer, it always works and it's easier to understand.
You can also use the ES6 syntax for default function parameters, but note that it doesn't work in older browsers (like IE). If you want to support these browsers, you should transpile your code with Babel.
See also Logical Operators on MDN.
falsy
, not JUSTundefined
. The amount of times I've seendoWeDoIt = doWeDoIt || true
, is enough to make me cry. (i.edoWeDoIt
will now never befalse
) – Spirant??
. Javascript evaluates non-null objects liketrue
(or better evalualtes null objects to false) – Soelchint y = x > 2 ? x : 1
orObject o = person ?: new Person()
. – Alliancefalse
. So stop loading tearsJS. :D – Motionfalsy
version of null-coelesce. Fortunately, there is now a proper??
in JS - before that was added, the correct equivalent to null-coelesce wasvalue != null ? value : YOUR_DEFAULT
. – Cramervalue != null ? value : YOUR_DEFAULT
. Using||
as if it wasnull coalesce
was never a good habit. Subtle bug if you encountered any "falsey" value, but were thinking of it as "not null" rather than "not falsey". Maybe call||
the "truthy coalesce operator"? :) – Cramer