Iif equivalent in C#

Question

Is there an IIf equivalent in C#? Or similar shortcut?

Dispute

I think you meant "short cut", rather than "short circuit" (which has a specific meaning regarding boolean operators) - am I right? – Yatzeck

Answer 1

C# has the ? ternary operator, like other C-style languages. However, this is not perfectly equivalent to IIf(); there are two important differences.

To explain the first difference, the false-part argument for this IIf() call causes a DivideByZeroException, even though the boolean argument is True.

IIf(true, 1, 1/0)

IIf() is just a function, and like all functions all the arguments must be evaluated before the call is made. Put another way, IIf() does not short circuit in the traditional sense. On the other hand, this ternary expression does short-circuit, and so is perfectly fine:

(true)?1:1/0;

The other difference is IIf() is not type safe. It accepts and returns arguments of type Object. The ternary operator is type safe. It uses type inference to know what types it's dealing with. Note you can fix this very easily with your own generic IIF(Of T)() implementation, but out of the box that's not the way it is.

If you really want IIf() in C#, you can have it:

object IIf(bool expression, object truePart, object falsePart) 
{return expression?truePart:falsePart;}

or a generic/type-safe implementation:

T IIf<T>(bool expression, T truePart, T falsePart) 
{return expression?truePart:falsePart;}

On the other hand, if you want the ternary operator in VB, Visual Studio 2008 and later provide a new If() operator that works like C#'s ternary operator. It uses type inference to know what it's returning, and it really is an operator rather than a function. This means there's no issues from pre-evaluating expressions, even though it has function semantics.

Thereunder

VB9 does support a true ternary operator. If(SomeBool, MessageBox.Show("True"), MessageBox.Show("False")) As seen here: community.bartdesmet.net/blogs/bart/archive/2007/08/31/… – Grogshop

I mention it in the last paragraph, but the question was specifically about IIf(). – Thereunder

Answer 2

VB.NET:

If(someBool, "true", "false")

C#

someBool ? "true" : "false";

Forficate

While this is true for simple expressions, the two forms are not exactly equivalent if there are side effects in the alternative expressions. Iif(t, foo(), bar()) will call both foo() and bar(), while t ? foo() : bar() will only call either foo() or bar() but not both. See Joel Coehoorn's answer to this question for more information. – Malcommalcontent

Updated answer to use VB.NET's "If" function instead of "IIf" so that the two code blocks are equivalent. – Forficate

Answer 3

the ternary operator

bool a = true;

string b = a ? "if_true" : "if_false";

Mcclintock

i'd add a comment there that that's string b= (a ? "asdf" : "dsrs"); i.e. then it's possible to better understand how the thing works, and to see that it's not something really weird and nonsensical like (string b=a) ? "sdf" : "sdsdf"). – Bennink

Answer 4

Also useful is the coalesce operator ??:

VB:

Return Iif( s IsNot Nothing, s, "My Default Value" )

C#:

return s ?? "My Default Value";

Young

Answer 5

booleanExpression ? trueValue : falseValue;

Example:

string itemText = count > 1 ? "items" : "item";

http://zamirsblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/c-vb-equivalent-of-iif.html

Paradiddle

Answer 6

It's the ternary operator ?

string newString = i == 1 ? "i is one" : "i is not one";

Alliber

Answer 7

It's limited in that you can't put statements in there. You can only put values(or things that return/evaluate to values), to return

This works ('a' is a static int within class Blah)

Blah.a=Blah.a<5?1:8;

(round brackets are impicitly between the equals and the question mark).

This doesn't work.

Blah.a = Blah.a < 4 ? Console.WriteLine("asdf") : Console.WriteLine("34er");
or
Blah.a = Blah.a < 4 ? MessageBox.Show("asdf") : MessageBox.Show("34er");

So you can only use the c# ternary operator for returning values. So it's not quite like a shortened form of an if. Javascript and perhaps some other languages let you put statements in there.

Bennink

Yes, because it's setting a value, not invoking a method. You could use Action to do what you want though. – Straightout

@KieranFoot WriteLine is a method. Been a while, but If iif or the ternary operator, let you put a return value in there like Blah.a = Blah.a < 4 ? Console.WriteLine("asdf"); return 1: Console.WriteLine("34er") ; return 2; then if it allowed that, it'd work, but apparently it doesn't. And yeah it's still setting a value, and no it's not calling any new method there. – Bennink

You could easily make it an inline if that executes one of 2 actions as I said. – Straightout