A refspec tells git how to map references from a remote to the local repo.
The value you listed was +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* +refs/merge-requests/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/merge-requests/*
; so let's break that down.
You have two patterns with a space between them; this just means you're giving multiple rules. (The pro git book refers to this as two refspecs; which is probably technically more correct. However, you just about always have the ability to list multiple refspecs if you need to, so in day to day life it likely makes little difference.)
The first pattern, then, is +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
which has three parts:
- The
+
means to apply the rule without failure even if doing so would move a target ref in a non-fast-forward manner. I'll come back to that.
- The part before the
:
(but after the +
if there is one) is the "source" pattern. That's refs/heads/*
, meaning this rule applies to any remote reference under refs/heads
(meaning, branches).
- The part after the
:
is the "destination" pattern. That's refs/remotes/origin/*
.
So if the origin has a branch master
, represented as refs/heads/master
, this will create a remote branch reference origin/master
represented as refs/remotes/origin/master
. And so on for any branch name (*
).
So back to that +
... suppose the origin has
A --- B <--(master)
You fetch and, applying that refspec you get
A --- B <--(origin/master)
(If you applied typical tracking rules and did a pull
you also have master
pointed at B
.)
A --- B <--(origin/master)(master)
Now some things happen on the remote. Someone maybe did a reset
that erased B
, then committed C
, then forced a push. So the remote says
A --- C <--(master)
When you fetch, you get
A --- B
\
C
and git must decide whether to allow the move of origin/master
from B
to C
. By default it wouldn't allow this because it's not a fast-forward (it would tell you it rejected the pull for that ref), but because the rule starts with +
it will accept it.
A --- B <--(master)
\
C <--(origin/master)
(A pull will in this case result in a merge commit.)
The second pattern is similar, but for merge-requests
refs (which I assume is related to your server's implementation of PR's; I'm not familiar with it).
More about refspecs: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Internals-The-Refspec