The resolved objects have the same life-time/dispose cycle as their container, that's unless you manually dispose the transient services in code using using
statement or .Dispose()
method.
In ASP.NET Core you get a scoped container that's instantiated per request and gets disposed at the end of the request. At this time, scoped and transient dependencies that were created by this container will get disposed too (that's if they implement IDisposable
interface), which you can also see on the source code here.
public void Dispose()
{
lock (ResolvedServices)
{
if (_disposeCalled)
{
return;
}
_disposeCalled = true;
if (_transientDisposables != null)
{
foreach (var disposable in _transientDisposables)
{
disposable.Dispose();
}
_transientDisposables.Clear();
}
// PERF: We've enumerating the dictionary so that we don't allocate to enumerate.
// .Values allocates a ValueCollection on the heap, enumerating the dictionary allocates
// a struct enumerator
foreach (var entry in ResolvedServices)
{
(entry.Value as IDisposable)?.Dispose();
}
ResolvedServices.Clear();
}
}
Singletons get disposed when the parent container gets disposed, usually means when the application shuts down.
TL;DR: As long as you don't instantiate scoped/transient services during application startup (using app.ApplicationServices.GetService<T>()
) and your services correctly implement Disposable interface (like pointed in MSDN) there is nothing you need to take care of.
The parent container is unavailable outside of Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
method unless you do some funky things to make it accessible outside (which you shouldn't anyways).
Of course, its encouraged to free up transient services as soon as possible, especially if they consume much resources.
lock
being used on a publicly-visible property (ResolvedServices
in this case), which I always thought was against the recommendations. – Axon