Copy/fork a git repo on github into same organization

Question

I have a repo on github that contains a web application that's deployed to two different domains. The application has slight logic forks here and there to behave differently depending on which domain it's deployed to.

It's come to the point to where I want to split it into two separate repos, one for each domain.

Github won't let me fork it into the same organization. Searching for "git duplicate repo" suggests I should bare clone and mirror push it, but that seems to be for keeping both repos in sync, which I don't want to do.

What's the best way to go about this? I'd like to preserve the old commit history in the new copy if possible.

Enaenable

Actually, the git clone --bare and git push --mirror options are exactly what you want. This does not keep both repos in sync. But it does preserve everything, including all branches, tags, etc. Just do this in a temporary directory to make a copy. Then clone the new copy directly from your remote in your project directory. – Brachyuran

Answer 1

Just create a new repository and push to it from your working copy:

git clone [email protected]:me/myrepo-original
cd myrepo-original
git remote set-url origin [email protected]:me/myrepo-new
git push origin master

Now you have a new repository, myrepo-new, which is identical to myrepo-original.

Kosiur

Ok, and these won't track each other, right? Meaning they become two separate disconnected repos? That's what I want. – Enaenable

Neither repository will update unless you push to it explicitly, and the "new" repository will not display any relation to the old one. – Kosiur

You could also push all the branches: git push --all origin – Edna

This worked for me, but I had to change to a different format for the URL: $ git remote set-url github.com/me/myrepo-new.git – Aq

Might be worth also noting, if you already have your original repo on your comp and then just run git remote set-url origin [email protected]:me/myrepo-new before you push to the new repo you are probably going to want to run git remote set-url origin [email protected]:me/origina-repo afterwards to set your remote back to the original one. – Tabling

I understand that the question in the body is different from the question in the title, but this is not a valid answer for the question in the title. Forking includes many more functionalities than simply "copying" a repository, such as pulling and pushing from the parent repository, which the solution to this answer does not support. – Ugh

Answer 2

If you do not need the fork relation (e.g. you want some kind of decoupled alternate repo for whatever reason), duplicating the repo as outlines by your Google finds and larsks's answer is fine.

If you do want to make it a fork, contact Github support ([email protected] or https://github.com/support), and they will create a fork in the same organization for you. (They're not picky about this either, you'll have just to provide an alternative name for the repo, as repo names within an account must be unique.)

---

Update: User Steve Rice reports in the comments below that GitHub Support stated that support would not currently/no longer set up a second fork in your account.

GitHub recently posted an article about possible alternatives to forking a repo into the same account. You used to be able to read that article here--dead link.

2023 update: GitHub now supports forking a repo into the same organization. See Improved innersource collaboration and enterprise fork policies

Fractostratus

Contacted support, their response: "At this time, an account cannot own two repos in the same network." They suggest setting up a mirror repo instead. – Phoneme

ahw that sucks. sorry, I did not know they had changed their policy :( – Fractostratus

Unfortunately, that article link is stale (I'd suggest an edit but the edit queue is full at this time) – Ault

Note that forking into the same organization only seems to be available with Github Enterprise Server, not github.com. See @VonC answer below. – Land

Answer 3

Use Github's Import Repository option on the + menu on top of the page or just open

https://github.com/new/import

This creates a new repository with the exact contents of the copied repository. The downside (the same as for git commands answer by Iarsks) is that it doesn't count as a fork for Github.

Passionless

How were you unable to make this option work?I just retested it and it works in two easy steps. Alternatively, create a local repo in github, then use the import feature there, e.g. github.com/sarob/mytest/import . – Passionless

Could be something with our GHE vs github.com but it doesn't work over there. – Jesse

great solution! – Motorcar

Answer 4

I know this is a super old thread, but I stumbled across it looking for the the answer and subsequently found a better way:

Make the repo you want to copy a template repo. It is a check box at the top of the repository settings. After you do this, there will be a big green button labeled "Use this template" at the top of the repo next to the Code button. Click that, and it will make a copy of the repo in whichever account you want.

Tautomerism

This is a great modern alternative since github will mark the new repo as "generated from <old repo>". There's the caveat that you will lose your git history, but if it's a hard fork that shouldn't matter as much. You can also unmark the original repo as a template once you are done. – Unlikely

Answer 5

Another way would be to add the original repo, to be copied, as remote for our current repo.

#create a new repo in the org1 organization called myrepo-new

In your local terminal, run:

git clone [email protected]:org1/myrepo-new
cd myrepo-new
git remote -v #shows current repo link on github as origin
git remote add name-for-remote https://github.com/org1/repo-old
git remote -v #shows repo-old as name-for-remote
git fetch  name-for-remote
git merge name-for-remote/branch-to-get-from-remote
#Now fix any conflicts if present
#If number of files/commits is very high, the desktop client may hang when you try to commit your changes after merge. Try switching to Git Shell if this happens.
git status 
git commit -m "commit message"
git push origin master

Galyak

Answer 6

Alternative solution:

Create a new organisation and fork it there. If the repo is private, it will stay private in the new org as well. Then you can give access to external devs or whoever you want to the forked repo and they can raise PRs back to original repo.

Variometer

Answer 7

You can mark the first repo as a Template (in settings) and then "Use" that template repo when you create a new repo. It's not exactly a fork, but functionally equivalent in some respects.

Prau

Answer 8

Github won't let me fork it into the same organization

GitHub does let you fork within the same organisation, since June 2022
(But only for GHES -- GitHub Enterprise Server --/GH Cloud, not github.com).

Improved innersource collaboration and enterprise fork policies

Previously, three aspects of repository forks caused friction to innersource collaboration and administration:

1. Repositories could not be forked within a single organization.
2. Repositories with internal visibility could not be forked to an organization.
3. Enterprise owners lacked control over where repositories could be forked.

These obstacles have been addressed with the following new features. We're always looking for new ways to improve repository collaboration and we welcome your ideas.

Fork a repository to the same organization as its parent

Previously, a repository could be forked only to a different organization or user account.

Now, a repository can be forked to the same organization as its parent repository, addressing situations where people are working in one organization and don't want to fork a repository to a different organization or user account.

Florella

This does not seem to work for public open source projects. – Maremma

@IngoSteinke This is for GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) or GitHub Enterprise Cloud. Not for your regular github.com. – Florella

I see, but I thought the original post was about the regular github.com. I was not aware about an irregular version before. – Maremma