While writing QUnit tests I was suprised by the behaviour of 'throws'. Regarding the following code (http://jsfiddle.net/DuYAc/75/), could anyone please answer my questions:
function subfunc() {
throw "subfunc error";
}
function func() {
try {
subfunc();
} catch (e) {}
}
test("official cookbook example", function () {
throws(function () {
throw "error";
}, "Must throw error to pass.");
});
test("Would expect this to work", function () {
throws(subfunc(), "Must throw error to pass.");
});
test("Why do I need this encapsulation?", function () {
throws(function(){subfunc()}, "Must throw error to pass.");
});
test("Would expect this to fail, because func does not throw any exception.", function () {
throws(func(), "Must throw error to pass.");
});
Only the second test fails, although this would have been my natural choice of writing this test...
Questions:
1) Why do I have to use an inline function to surround my tested function?
2) Why does the last test not fail? 'func' does not throw any exception.
Would be grateful to read any explanation.