I believe my understanding of boost::mpl::set must be fundamentally flawed. I thought it only allowed unique types.
But the following code compiles:
#include <boost/mpl/set.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/accumulate.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/plus.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/int.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/placeholders.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/sizeof.hpp>
#include <boost/mpl/assert.hpp>
using namespace boost::mpl;
typedef set<long,float,long> my_set; //long repeated in set?
typedef vector<long,float,long> my_vec; //seems reasonable
typedef accumulate<
my_set
, int_<0>
, plus<_1, sizeof_<_2>>
>::type set_size;
typedef accumulate<
my_vec
, int_<0>
, plus<_1, sizeof_<_2>>
>::type vec_size;
BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_RELATION( vec_size::value, ==, sizeof(long)+sizeof(float)+sizeof(long) );
//why does the following line compile?
//shouldn't the size be sizeof(long)+sizeof(float) instead?
BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_RELATION( set_size::value, ==, sizeof(long)+sizeof(float)+sizeof(long) );
typedef set<long,float,long> my_vec;
meant to betypedef vector<long,float,long> my_vec;
? – Sukkoth