What does libstdc++'s std::vector<bool>::data do?

Question

According to the standard, std::vector<bool> has no member function data(). However, the following snippet compiles fine with the latest GCC with libstdc++:

#include <vector>

int main () {
    std::vector<bool> v;
    v.data();
}

If we try to use the result, it turns out the return type is void.

Is this some gcc extension or a bug?
If the former is true, what does it do?

Shoshonean

I disagree with the dupe. I am aware that the standard does not define the function in question, I'm asking about the behavior of a specific implementation. – Shoshonean

Did you read the source code? GCC is open source. – Chlorpromazine

@LightnessRacesinOrbit I admit I did not. Looks like that would have helped. :) – Shoshonean

It looks like it also has emplace() and emplace_back(). They're probably no-ops, or something. – Accomplished

@JustinTime No, it does need those two. – Doubtless

@Doubtless My mistake, I wasn't aware that C++14 added them. – Accomplished

Answer 1

My /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/stl_bvector.h has:

// _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
// DR 464. Suggestion for new member functions in standard containers.
// N.B. DR 464 says nothing about vector<bool> but we need something
// here due to the way we are implementing DR 464 in the debug-mode
// vector class.
void
data() _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT { }

In /usr/include/c++/4.8/debug/vector I see the declaration:

using _Base::data;

So that seems to be the reason: the debug version of std::vector<bool> wouldn't compile unless std::vector<bool>::data existed.

Magnetohydrodynamics

Link to the mentioned DR for reference. – Shoshonean

Sad. It would be useful if it returned a pointer to the packed buffer. Why not make it private? – Ens