I have a repo consisting of files, related to four Ruby homework task. My fifth task is to refactor each of the previous four tasks the best way I can and mark each small refactoring as a single git commit, so that when one opens the git history, they could easily see what has changed (like Use map instead of each
, Rename instance variable
, etc.). I have a branch, called task-1
and now I am done with my commits for the first task. I want to merge it to master
. Then I will make a new branch task-2
and when ready, will merge it to master
. But I want to have a clear indicator where commits, related to task 1 finish and commits for task 2 begin in git history. One way would be to amend the commit message of my last commit to include ..and finish task 1
, but I was wondering if there is some more intelligent way. Another way I though of, was to make a minor change, like add a space somewhere and use the commit message for this commit. What is the proper way to mark important events / milestones in git / Github?
Tagging is probably something you want to do, but if you want something in your commit log, the following may work:
You could use the no fast-forward tag when merging your branch. This adds a specific commit for the merging, and you could add 'finish task 1' to the commit message. So for instance you would do:
git merge task-1 --no-ff
And then you have a clear indication of where this branch was merged in.
I hope I understood your question properly, and this helps you out.
Use git tag
to mark important milestones in your code.
Example - git tag -a v1
will tag the current code as v1. You can always checkout this code by running git checkout v1
git tag -l
can list all your tags.
Finally, remember to push your tags to the remote repository - git push --tags
-a
option to create an annotated tag instead of a lightweight one. –
Ponce git checkout <tag>
later on, you end up with a Detached HEAD
. Is there a way of simply assigning a name to a particular commit (like an alias to the hash a commit generates) with no strings attached? –
Matthieu Tagging is probably something you want to do, but if you want something in your commit log, the following may work:
You could use the no fast-forward tag when merging your branch. This adds a specific commit for the merging, and you could add 'finish task 1' to the commit message. So for instance you would do:
git merge task-1 --no-ff
And then you have a clear indication of where this branch was merged in.
I hope I understood your question properly, and this helps you out.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.