Is there any difference when using Spring Data JPA keywords between:
List<SomeEntity> findBySomeCondition();
and
List<SomeEntity> findAllBySomeCondition();
Is there any difference when using Spring Data JPA keywords between:
List<SomeEntity> findBySomeCondition();
and
List<SomeEntity> findAllBySomeCondition();
No, there is no difference between them, they will execute exactly the same query, the All
part is ignored by Spring Data when deriving the query from the method name. The only important bit is the By
keyword, anything following it is treated as a field name (with the exception of other keywords like OrderBy
which incidentially can lead to some strange looking method names like findAllByOrderByIdAsc
).
This means something like this is perfectly valid:
List<SomeEntity> findAnythingYouWantToPutHereBySomeCondition();
And will execute exactly the same SQL query as:
List<SomeEntity> findBySomeCondition();
or
List<SomeEntity> findAllBySomeCondition();
The documentation for the 2.3.6 release of Spring Data discusses this feature:
Any text between
find
(or other introducing keywords) andBy
is considered to be descriptive unless using one of the result-limiting keywords such as aDistinct
to set a distinct flag on the query to be created orTop
/First
to limit query results.
The purpose of feature was explained in a blog post about the then-upcoming 2.0 release of Spring Data:
Spring Data’s method parsing uses prefix keywords like
find
,exists
,count
, anddelete
and a terminatingBy
keyword. Everything you put in betweenfind
andBy
makes your method name more expressive and does not affect query derivation.
findDistinctBySomeCondition()
: 4.4.2. Query Creation –
Espousal To illustrate the difference lets look at the two functions:
1. Set<Policy> findAllByRoleIn(Iterable<Role> role);
2. Set<Policy> findByRoleIn(Iterable<Role> role);
The query generated by 1st function:
1. select policy.id, policy.role from policy where (policy.role in (? , ? , ? , ?))
The query generated by 2nd function:
2. select policy.id, policy.role from policy where (policy.role in (? , ? , ? , ?))
Conclusion: Clearly, if we look at the queries generated by both functions. We can clearly see, there is no difference between the two function definitions, they execute exactly the same query.
one difference is that with findAllBy Hibernate filters (@Filters from org.hibernate.annotations) are applied and so a different sql.
Actually, the difference between findallBy and findby, is that : findAllBy returns a Collection but findBy returns Optional.
so it's preferable to write List findAllBy instead of writing List findBy (but it will work also :p). and to write Optional findBy instead of Optional findAllBy.
check this doc https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/jpa/docs/current/reference/html/#repositories.core-concepts
findBy method is used if we want to find by name or some other criteria like findByFirstName(String firstName);
findAll methods generally finds by providing specification
List<T> findAll(Specification<T> spec);
Please see docs below for more clarity:
http://docs.spring.io/spring-data/jpa/docs/1.4.3.RELEASE/reference/html/jpa.repositories.html
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.