I have four classes (A
,B
,C
and D
) following the classic diamond pattern and a Container
class containing a unique_ptr<A>
. I want to serialize these classes using the cereal serialization library.
struct A {int f1; int f2; int f3}
struct B : public virtual A {
template<typename Archive>
inline void save(Archive& ar) const {
std::cerr << "Saving Obj: " << this << std::endl;
std::cerr << "This: " << &(this->f1) << " "
<< &(this->f2) << " " << &(this->f3) << std::endl;
std::cerr << "This: " << this->f1 << " "
<< this->f2 << " " << this->f3 << std::endl;
};
}
};
struct C : public virtual A {};
struct D : public B, public C {};
#include <cereal/archives/binary.hpp>
CEREAL_REGISTER_TYPE(B);
CEREAL_REGISTER_TYPE(C);
CEREAL_REGISTER_TYPE(D);
struct Container {
std::unique_ptr<A> obj;
template<typename Archive>
inline void save(Archive& ar) const {
std::cerr << "Saving Container" << std::endl;
std::cerr << "Obj Addr: " << obj.get() << std::endl;
std::cerr << "Obj: " << &(obj->f1) << " " << &(obj->f2)
<< " " << &(pq->f3) << std::endl;
std::cerr << "Obj: " << " " << pq->sq_count << " " << pq->sq_bits
<< " " << pq->dim << std::endl;
ar(obj); // Call serialization for obj, ie B.save(...)
}
}
All classes have cereal save
and load
functions, but I only included them for B
and Container
, as they are the only ones used in this example.
I use these classes as follows :
std::unique_ptr<A> obj(new B);
obj->f1 = 8;
obj->f2 = 8;
obj->f3 = 128;
std::unique_ptr<Container> db(new Container);
db.obj = std::move(obj);
std::ofstream out_file(out_filename);
cereal::BinaryOutputArchive out_archive(out_file);
out_archive(db);
And I get the following output:
Saving Container
Obj Addr: 0x23d2128
Obj: 0x23d2130 0x23d2134 0x23d2138 // Fields adresses (f1,f2,f3)
Obj: 8 8 128 // Fields values
Saving Obj: 0x23d2128 // Same object
This: 0x23d2118 0x23d211c 0x23d2120 // Different field adresses !
This: 4293296 0 37569440 // Garbage
My question is: Is it likely that this is a bug in cereal, or is there something that I don't get with virtual inheritance ?
Is it expected that the addresses of the fields of a given object ever change in a C++ program ?
ar(obj)
callB::save(ar)
? – Garrettobj
is astd::unique_ptr<A>
, and the most-derived type of*obj
isA
. Where doesB
jump in? – Garrett*obj
should be B, I got the question wrong. – Shellfish