I am in the midst of re-writing a SAS program I normally use into R. Many statements in the SAS program are written with proc sql, so for ease of programming I am replicating those statements with sqldf in R. All of the sql code works the same with sqldf as it does in SAS, except for this statement:
SAS:
proc sql;
create table merged32 as
select max(ctf) as ctf,
max(ctms) as ctms,
max(site_name) as site_name,
provider_id, npi,
first_name, middle_name, last_name, specialty,
address_1, city, state, site_ct, zip, site_key
from merged2
group by 9,10,11,12,14,15;
quit;
run;
sqldf:
sqldf("select max(ctf) as ctf,
max(ctms) as ctms,
max(site_name) as site_name,
provider_id, npi,
first_name, middle_name, last_name, specialty,
address_1, city, state, site_ct, zip, site_key
from merged2
group by 9,10,11,12,14,15")
In SAS, it returns a dataset with 1878 rows; in sqldf, a dataframe with 1375.
Are there any major differences between proc sql and sqldf that could be causing this, or in general that need to be considered? I didn't provide data because 1) the datasets are huge, and 2) I'm more just interested in knowing the differences between the two sql systems.