Send/receive Packets with TCP sockets

Question

Recently, I managed to create sockets on my PC and my Raspberry Pi to enable communication between both devices. Currently, the client is able to automatically send messages to the server. I was wondering, if it is possible to modify the scripts to send tcp data packets instead of purely text messages, as I would very much like to control the raspberry pi using my PC in the future without having the need to ssh/etc.

I've looked at some examples, but as I don't have much experience in writing my own scripts/codes, I'm not very sure how to go about doing this. I would appreciate if someone could guide me in the right direction with explanation and some examples if possible.

Anyway here is the server/client script I'm running at the moment:

Client:

import socket   
import sys  
import struct
import time

#main function
if __name__ == "__main__":

    if(len(sys.argv) < 2) :
        print 'Usage : python client.py hostname'
        sys.exit()

    host = sys.argv[1]
    port = 8888

#create an INET, STREAMing socket
try:
    s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
except socket.error:
    print 'Failed to create socket'
    sys.exit()

print 'Socket Created'

try:
    remote_ip = socket.gethostbyname( host )
    s.connect((host, port))

except socket.gaierror:
    print 'Hostname could not be resolved. Exiting'
    sys.exit()

print 'Socket Connected to ' + host + ' on ip ' + remote_ip

#Send some data to remote server
message = "Test"

try :
    #Set the whole string
    while True:
        s.send(message)
        print 'Message sent successfully'
        time.sleep(1)
        print 'Sending...'
except socket.error:
    #Send failed
    print 'Send failed'
    sys.exit()

def recv_timeout(the_socket,timeout=2):
    #make socket non blocking
    the_socket.setblocking(0)

    #total data partwise in an array
    total_data=[];
    data='';

    #beginning time
    begin=time.time()
    while 1:
        #if you got some data, then break after timeout
        if total_data and time.time()-begin > timeout:
            break

        #if you got no data at all, wait a little longer, twice the timeout
        elif time.time()-begin > timeout*2:
            break

        #recv something
        try:
            data = the_socket.recv(8192)
            if data:
                total_data.append(data)
                #change the beginning time for measurement
                begin=time.time()
            else:
                #sleep for sometime to indicate a gap
                time.sleep(0.1)
        except:
            pass

    #join all parts to make final string
    return ''.join(total_data)

#get reply and print
print recv_timeout(s)

s.close()

Server:

import socket
import sys
from thread import *

HOST = ''   # Symbolic name meaning all available interfaces
PORT = 8888

s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
print 'Socket created'

try:
    s.bind((HOST, PORT))
except socket.error , msg:
    print 'Bind failed. Error Code : ' + str(msg[0]) + ' Message ' + msg[1]
    sys.exit()

print 'Socket bind complete'

s.listen(10)
print 'Socket now listening'

#Function for handling connections
def clientthread(conn):
    #Sending message to connected client
    conn.send('Welcome to the server. Receving Data...\n') #send only takes string

    #infinite loop so that function do not terminate and thread do not end.
    while True:

        #Receiving from client
        data = conn.recv(1024)
        reply = 'Message Received at the server!\n'
        print data
        if not data:
            break

        conn.sendall(reply)

    conn.close()

#now keep talking with the client
while 1:
    #wait to accept a connection
    conn, addr = s.accept()
    print 'Connected with ' + addr[0] + ':' + str(addr[1])

    #start new thread
    start_new_thread(clientthread ,(conn,))

s.close()

Biotite

Answer 1

socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) already creates a connection that provides a reliable stream of bytes between two machines. This uses TCP, which is on top of IP and Ethernet. The latter two are package-based, while TCP creates a stream of continuous bytes on top of it. It also adds some error checking and error correction, so it is pretty reliable.

I honestly don't understand what you want to achieve with what you call "send packets". What you don't want to do is to create an implementation of TCP yourself, as that's a non-trivial task, so sending RAW packets is out. In general, even using TCP is already relatively low-level and should be avoided unless really necessary.

Using e.g. ZeroMQ you get a message-based interface that does all the transmission for you. It does so on top of TCP (or other transports) and adds more error correction for e.g. disconnects. There, you also have something like "packets", but those are independent of how many TCP or IP packets were required to send it underneath. If you don't want to implement a specific protocol, I'd suggest you use this framework instead of lowlevel TCP sockets.

Another simple alternative is to use HTTP, for which there is also existing code in Python. The downside is that it is always one side that initiates some communication and the other side only replies. If you want some kind of active notification, you either have to poll or use hacks like delaying an answer.

Disoperation

Answer 2

You are already sending data packets - those packets juts happen to contain text data at the moment. Try looking into pickle in the standard libraries and into pyro.

Denesedengue

I was reading up RAW sockets and how they send/receive RAW packets in TCP/IP and would require the tcp & ip headers to be manually specified in the script. Would it be a better way to send the packets to the raspberry pi to control some of its functions instead? Sorry, as mentioned as I do not have much experience with sockets and packets. The scripts I'm running are standard sockets and the "message" payload is transmitted via TCP, is it possible to modify parts of the script to send packets(not as text data) to do the job instead? – Biotite

Also, would the socket.error handling be the only way to check for errors in the data sent? or is there some other way we could do the error checking, for example when data received at the server, it would perform a redundancy check to ensure that there is no data lost during transmission? – Biotite