1. Target Unreachable, identifier 'bean' resolved to null
This boils down to that the managed bean instance itself could not be found by exactly that identifier (managed bean name) in EL like so #{bean}.
Identifying the cause can be broken down into three steps:
a. Who's managing the bean?
b. What's the (default) managed bean name?
c. Where's the backing bean class?
1a. Who's managing the bean?
First step would be checking which bean management framework is responsible for managing the bean instance. Is it CDI via @Named? Or is it JSF via @ManagedBean? Or is it Spring via @Component? Can you make sure that you're not mixing multiple bean management framework specific annotations on the very same backing bean class? E.g. @Named @ManagedBean, @Named @Component, or @ManagedBean @Component. This is wrong. The bean must be managed by at most one bean management framework and that framework must be properly configured. If you already have no idea which to choose, head to Backing beans (@ManagedBean) or CDI Beans (@Named)? and Spring JSF integration: how to inject a Spring component/service in JSF managed bean?
In case it's CDI who's managing the bean via @Named, then you need to make sure of the following:
CDI 1.0 (Java EE 6) requires an /WEB-INF/beans.xml file in order to enable CDI in WAR. It can be empty or it can have just the following content:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd">
</beans>
CDI 1.1 (Java EE 7) without any beans.xml, or an empty beans.xml file, or with the above CDI 1.0 compatible beans.xml will behave the same as CDI 1.0. When there's a CDI 1.1 compatible beans.xml with an explicit version="1.1", then it will by default only register @Named beans with an explicit CDI scope annotation such as @RequestScoped, @ViewScoped, @SessionScoped, @ApplicationScoped, etc. In case you intend to register all beans as CDI managed beans, even those without an explicit CDI scope, use the below CDI 1.1 compatible /WEB-INF/beans.xml with bean-discovery-mode="all" set (the default is bean-discovery-mode="annotated").
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee
http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_1.xsd"
version="1.1" bean-discovery-mode="all">
</beans>
When using CDI 1.1+ with bean-discovery-mode="annotated" (default), make sure that you didn't accidentally import a JSF scope such as javax.faces.bean.RequestScoped instead of a CDI scope javax.enterprise.context.RequestScoped. Watch out with IDE autocomplete.
When using Mojarra 2.3.0-2.3.2 and CDI 1.1+ with bean-discovery-mode="annotated" (default), then you need to upgrade Mojarra to 2.3.3 or newer due to a bug. In case you can't upgrade, then you need either to set bean-discovery-mode="all" in beans.xml, or to put the JSF 2.3 specific @FacesConfig annotation on an arbitrary class in the WAR (generally some sort of an application scoped startup class).
When using JSF 2.3 on a Servlet 4.0 container with a web.xml declared conform Servlet 4.0, then you need to explicitly put the JSF 2.3 specific @FacesConfig annotation on an arbitrary class in the WAR (generally some sort of an application scoped startup class). This is not necessary in Servlet 3.x.
When using CDI 3.0, the first version with package renamed from javax.* to jakarta.*, then you need to ensure that all deployment descriptor files beans.xml, web.xml, faces-config.xml are conform the new jakartaee schemas and thus not conform the old javaee schemes.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee
https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee/beans_3_0.xsd"
version="3.0" bean-discovery-mode="all">
</beans>
Non-JEE containers like Tomcat and Jetty doesn't ship with CDI bundled. You need to install it manually. It's a bit more work than just adding the library JAR(s). For Tomcat, make sure that you follow the instructions in this answer: How to install and use CDI on Tomcat?
Your runtime classpath is clean and free of duplicates in CDI API related JARs. Make sure that you're not mixing multiple CDI implementations (Weld, OpenWebBeans, etc). Make sure that you don't provide another CDI or even Java EE API JAR file along webapp when the target container already bundles CDI API out the box.
If you're packaging CDI managed beans for JSF views in a JAR, then make sure that the JAR has at least a valid /META-INF/beans.xml (which can be kept empty).
In case it's JSF who's managing the bean via the since 2.3 deprecated @ManagedBean, and you can't migrate to CDI, then you need to make sure of the following:
The faces-config.xml root declaration is compatible with JSF 2.0. So the XSD file and the version must at least specify JSF 2.0 or higher and thus not 1.x.
<faces-config
xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_2_0.xsd"
version="2.0">
For JSF 2.1, just replace 2_0 and 2.0 by 2_1 and 2.1 respectively.
If you're on JSF 2.2 or higher, then make sure you're using xmlns.jcp.org namespaces instead of java.sun.com over all place.
<faces-config
xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_2_2.xsd"
version="2.2">
For JSF 2.3, just replace 2_2 and 2.2 by 2_3 and 2.3 respectively.
You didn't accidentally import javax.annotation.ManagedBean instead of javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean. Watch out with IDE autocomplete, Eclipse is known to autosuggest the wrong one as first item in the list.
You didn't override the @ManagedBean by a JSF 1.x style <managed-bean> entry in faces-config.xml on the very same backing bean class along with a different managed bean name. This one will have precedence over @ManagedBean. Registering a managed bean in faces-config.xml is not necessary since JSF 2.0, just remove it.
Your runtime classpath is clean and free of duplicates in JSF API related JARs. Make sure that you're not mixing multiple JSF implementations (Mojarra and MyFaces). Make sure that you don't provide another JSF or even Java EE API JAR file along webapp when the target container already bundles JSF API out the box. See also "Installing JSF" section of our JSF wiki page for JSF installation instructions. In case you intend to upgrade container-bundled JSF from the WAR on instead of in container itself, make sure that you've instructed the target container to use WAR-bundled JSF API/impl.
If you're packaging JSF managed beans in a JAR, then make sure that the JAR has at least a JSF 2.0 compatible /META-INF/faces-config.xml. See also How to reference JSF managed beans which are provided in a JAR file?
If you're actually using the jurassic JSF 1.x, and you can't upgrade, then you need to register the bean via <managed-bean> in faces-config.xml instead of @ManagedBean. Don't forget to fix your project build path as such that you don't have JSF 2.x libraries anymore (so that the @ManagedBean annotation wouldn't confusingly successfully compile).
In case it's Spring who's managing the bean via @Component, then you need to make sure of the following:
Spring is being installed and integrated as per its documentation. Importantingly, you need to at least have this in web.xml:
<listener>
<listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener</listener-class>
</listener>
And this in faces-config.xml:
<application>
<el-resolver>org.springframework.web.jsf.el.SpringBeanFacesELResolver</el-resolver>
</application>
(above is all I know with regard to Spring — I don't do Spring — feel free to edit/comment with other probable Spring related causes; e.g. some XML configuration related trouble)
In case it's a repeater component who's managing the (nested) bean via its var attribute (e.g. <h:dataTable var="item">, <ui:repeat var="item">, <p:tabView var="item">, etc) and you actually got a "Target Unreachable, identifier 'item' resolved to null", then you need to make sure of the following:
The #{item} is not referenced in binding attribtue of any child component. This is incorrect as binding attribute runs during view build time, not during view render time. Moreover, there's physically only one component in the component tree which is simply reused during every iteration round. In other words, you should actually be using binding="#{bean.component}" instead of binding="#{item.component}". But much better is to get rid of component bining to bean altogether and investigate/ask the proper approach for the problem you thought to solve this way. See also How does the 'binding' attribute work in JSF? When and how should it be used?
1b. What's the (default) managed bean name?
Second step would be checking the registered managed bean name. JSF and Spring use conventions conform JavaBeans specification while CDI has exceptions depending on CDI impl/version.
A FooBean backing bean class like below,
@Named
public class FooBean {}
will in all bean management frameworks have a default managed bean name of #{fooBean}, as per JavaBeans specification.
A FOOBean backing bean class like below,
@Named
public class FOOBean {}
whose unqualified classname starts with at least two capitals will in JSF and Spring have a default managed bean name of exactly the unqualified class name #{FOOBean}, also conform JavaBeans specificiation. In CDI, this is also the case in Weld versions released before June 2015, but not in Weld versions released after June 2015 (2.2.14/2.3.0.B1/3.0.0.A9) nor in OpenWebBeans due to an oversight in CDI spec. In those Weld versions and in all OWB versions it is only with the first character lowercased #{fOOBean}.
If you have explicitly specified a managed bean name foo like below,
@Named("foo")
public class FooBean {}
or equivalently with @ManagedBean(name="foo") or @Component("foo"), then it will only be available by #{foo} and thus not by #{fooBean}.
1c. Where's the backing bean class?
Third step would be doublechecking if the backing bean class is at the right place in the built and deployed WAR file. Make sure that you've properly performed a full clean, rebuild, redeploy and restart of the project and server in case you was actually busy writing code and impatiently pressing F5 in the browser. If still in vain, let the build system produce a WAR file, which you then extract and inspect with a ZIP tool. The compiled .class file of the backing bean class must reside in its package structure in /WEB-INF/classes. Or, when it's packaged as part of a JAR module, the JAR containing the compiled .class file must reside in /WEB-INF/lib and thus not e.g. EAR's /lib or elsewhere.
If you're using Eclipse, make sure that the backing bean class is in src and thus not WebContent, and make sure that Project > Build Automatically is enabled. If you're using Maven, make sure that the backing bean class is in src/main/java and thus not in src/main/resources or src/main/webapp.
If you're packaging the web application as part of an EAR with EJB+WAR(s), then you need to make sure that the backing bean classes are in WAR module and thus not in EAR module nor EJB module. The business tier (EJB) must be free of any web tier (WAR) related artifacts, so that the business tier is reusable across multiple different web tiers (JSF, JAX-RS, JSP/Servlet, etc).
2. Target Unreachable, 'entity' returned null
This boils down to that the nested property entity as in #{bean.entity.property} returned null. This usually only exposes when JSF needs to set the value for property via an input component like below, while the #{bean.entity} actually returned null.
<h:inputText value="#{bean.entity.property}" />
You need to make sure that you have prepared the model entity beforehand in a @PostConstruct, or <f:viewAction> method, or perhaps an add() action method in case you're working with CRUD lists and/or dialogs on same view.
@Named
@ViewScoped
public class Bean {
private Entity entity; // +getter (setter is not necessary).
@Inject
private EntityService entityService;
@PostConstruct
public void init() {
// In case you're updating an existing entity.
entity = entityService.getById(entityId);
// Or in case you want to create a new entity.
entity = new Entity();
}
// ...
}
As to the importance of @PostConstruct; doing this in a regular constructor would fail in case you're using a bean management framework which uses proxies, such as CDI. Always use @PostConstruct to hook on managed bean instance initialization (and use @PreDestroy to hook on managed bean instance destruction). Additionally, in a constructor you wouldn't have access to any injected dependencies yet, see also NullPointerException while trying to access @Inject bean in constructor.
In case the entityId is supplied via <f:viewParam>, you'd need to use <f:viewAction> instead of @PostConstruct. See also When to use f:viewAction / preRenderView versus PostConstruct?
You also need to make sure that you preserve the non-null model during postbacks in case you're creating it only in an add() action method. Easiest would be to put the bean in the view scope. See also How to choose the right bean scope?
3. Target Unreachable, 'null' returned null
This has actually the same cause as #2, only the (older) EL implementation being used is somewhat buggy in preserving the property name to display in the exception message, which ultimately incorrectly exposed as 'null'. This only makes debugging and fixing a bit harder when you've quite some nested properties like so #{bean.entity.subentity.subsubentity.property}.
The solution is still the same: make sure that the nested entity in question is not null, in all levels.
4. Target Unreachable, ''0'' returned null
This has also the same cause as #2, only the (older) EL implementation being used is buggy in formulating the exception message. This exposes only when you use the brace notation [] in EL as in #{bean.collection[index]} where the #{bean.collection} itself is non-null, but the item at the specified index doesn't exist. Such a message must then be interpreted as:
Target Unreachable, 'collection[0]' returned null
The solution is also the same as #2: make sure that the collection item is available.
5. Target Unreachable, 'BracketSuffix' returned null
This has actually the same cause as #4, only the (older) EL implementation being used is somewhat buggy in preserving the iteration index to display in the exception message, which ultimately incorrectly exposed as 'BracketSuffix' which is really the character ]. This only makes debugging and fixing a bit harder when you've multiple items in the collection.
Other possible causes of javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException:
Class [ Lorg/mxchange/jfinancials/model/receipt/FinancialAdminReceiptSessionBeanRemote; ] not found. Error while loading [ cl ass org.mxchange.jfinancials.beans.financial.model.receipt.FinancialAdminReceiptWebRequestBean ]]]And that said bean (FinancialAdminReceiptWebRequestBean) could not be found and solved tonullfor sure. Another common mistake is, to not restart the application server after e.g. renaming or moving classes/interfaces (or forgotclean). – Dismal