SQL Network Interfaces, error: 50 - Local Database Runtime error occurred. The specified LocalDB instance does not exist
Asked Answered
R

3

6

EDIT: One important detail that I original left out (because I didn't know it was important) is that we were running these sites in full IIS, not from IIS Express.


We're trying to setup local dev environments for Kentico CMS that will add our local machines to our current synchronization chain of Dev --> Staging --> Prod (so we'll wind up with Locals --> Dev --> Staging --> Prod).

We copied our Dev DB to our local machines onto the (localdb)\v11.0 instance of SQL Server, but we're running into an issue on everyone's computers except mine.

Here's the error we're getting:

The application could not connect to the database, please check the connection string in the web.config file and SQL server availability.

Original error:

A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 50 - Local Database Runtime error occurred. The specified LocalDB instance does not exist. )

I've tried a ton of suggestions from other SO answers and other websites to figure out why we're getting this error (and why it's not happening on my machine), but no luck. We can connect to (localdb)\v11.0 in SSMS but we cannot connect to it through VS (same error). Also, when we open Sql Server Config Manager, we're not seeing any listings for SQL Server Services. Any ideas?

Reni answered 5/11, 2014 at 23:59 Comment(4)
Can you verify that localDb is installed on your machine? What happens if you open SSMS and try to connect to (localdb)\v11.0 ?Giorgi
We can connect to (localdb)\v11.0 through SSMS just fine, but we cannot add (localdb)\v11.0 as a connection in VS. I thought that was really weird since I was under the assumption that (localdb)\v11.0 was the instance that VS 2013 creates and uses by default.Reni
Have you looked into this? Connect LocalDb in VS server explorerGiorgi
Just talked to one of my developers, and apparently he did everything listed there except using the instance pipe name. He could connect to (localdb)\v11.0 from VS but his instance of Kentico was still getting the SQL Network Interfaces, error: 50. Can you use the instance pipe name as a connection string in the web config? We're going to put off testing this for a couple days because we found a work around and we're on a tight schedule, but we'll come back to it soon.Reni
L
7
  1. Make sure you have .NET Framework 4.0.2+ installed
  2. Set up your AppPool to run under the NetworkService account.
  3. Create a login for that account in your db.

    USE [master]; CREATE LOGIN [NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE] FROM WINDOWS; EXEC sp_addsrvrolemember N'NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE', SYSADMIN;

  4. Share your instance with all users by running SqlLocalDB share Kentico KenticoShared

  5. Use connection string in the following format:

<add name="CMSConnectionString" connectionString="Data Source=(localdb)\.\KenticoShared;Initial Catalog=KenticoDB;Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=60" />

  1. If it doesn't help use a named pipe:

<add key="CMSConnectionString" value="Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=SSPI;database=KenticoDB;server=np:\\.\pipe\LOCALDB#D2BA6590\tsql\query;Current Language=English;Connection Timeout=120;" />

Notes:

  1. the exact name of the NetworkService account on your machine can be determined by running following C#

var ns = new SecurityIdentifier(WellKnownSidType.NetworkServiceSid, null).Translate(typeof(NTAccount)).ToString()

  1. named pipe can be determined by running this in CMD: SqlLocalDB info KenticoShared
  2. don't forget to run your instance SqlLocalDB start KenticoShared
Ladle answered 6/11, 2014 at 21:19 Comment(2)
Thanks for this. For me what got the connection working was finding and using the named pipe. Both IIS Express and my IIS app pool run as the same user. Very mysterious why i could connect from one but not the other.Mcelrath
In hopes that this might come up in more search results, i'll also mention that besides the IIS weirdness, i also had this same issue on a connection from a Windows Service that was using SQL Server authentication, and the connection would mysteriously work or not work depending on what Windows user the service was configured to run as.Mcelrath
C
0

Seems a little obscure, but have you looked at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941823 , "Some or all SQL Server 2005 services are not listed in SQL Server Configuration Manager..."?

And there are generally two things that get in the way of connecting to SQL Server from an application even though you can connect using Management Studio. First, you should make sure that TCP is enabled on the instance, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb909712(v=vs.90).aspx . Second, since you're connecting to a named instance, which I'm assuming is not the default instance running on the standard port, you need to make sure that the SQL Server Browser service is running, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms165734(v=sql.90).aspx . This is what redirects applications to a non standard port without having to specify the port directly. The reason Management Studio can get past these is that it can connect through named pipes and skip TCP altogether.

Campos answered 6/11, 2014 at 6:51 Comment(0)
E
0

See this post as this solved my problem: These two posts on Using LocalDB with Full IIS should give you more information. Especially the second part seems relevant, but the first one contains some context as well.

  1. Part 1: User Profile
  2. Part 2: Instance Ownership

Credit: IIS connecting to LocalDB

Endoskeleton answered 10/7, 2016 at 17:14 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.