I am new to C++ and I am confused about std::endl
. When trying to understand what std::endl
is, I had faced some resources which told me that it is a function.
However, how can a function be deprived of parentheses?
I am new to C++ and I am confused about std::endl
. When trying to understand what std::endl
is, I had faced some resources which told me that it is a function.
However, how can a function be deprived of parentheses?
However, how can a function be deprived of parentheses?
The name of a function, without being followed by ()
, is just a reference to that function. It's exactly the same as with any other type:
void foo(int) {}
char x = 'a';
char *p = &x;
int main()
{
p; // Refers to p
*p; // Dereferences p (refers to whatever p points to)
foo; // Refers to foo
foo(42); // Calls foo
}
std::endl
is a function (actually a function template) which takes one parameter of type "a stream", and works by inserting an EOL representation into that stream and then flushing it. You can actually use it like any other function, if you want to:
std::endl(std::cout);
The final piece of the puzzle is that the standard library provides an overload (again, a template) of operator <<
such that the LHS argument is a stream and the RHS argument is a function; the implementation of this operator calls the RHS argument (the function) and passes it the LHS one (the stream). Conceptually, there's something like this:
Stream& operator<< (Stream &s, const Function &f)
{
f(s);
return s;
}
Therefore, calling std::cout << std::endl
invokes that operator overload, which in turn invokes std::endl(std::cout)
, which does the EOL insertion + flushing.
As to which form is to be preferred (direct call vs. <<
operator), it's definitely the use of <<
. It's idiomatic, and it allows easy composition of multiple stream manipulators within a single expression. Like this:
std::cout << "Temperature: " << std::fixed << std::setprecision(3) << temperature << " (rounds to " << std::setprecision(1) << temperature << ')' << std::endl;
std::cout << std::endl(std::cout)
gives an error, or am I doing something wrong? –
Ruler std::endl(std::cout);
instead of std::cout << std::endl;
as a single statement. –
Literary std::endl(std::cout)
function to stream std::cout
, and that's stream reference, so you are doing something like std::cout << std::cout
, with intermission of sending also EOL to the stream by the endl
function. I.e. doesn't make that much sense. –
Box std::endl(std::cout)
anywhere. Just call it like a plain old function. –
Warfare std::cout << std::endl
is effectively syntactic sugar for calling std::endl(std::cout)
, which inserts the newline & flushes the stream. –
Warfare std::cout << std::endl
at least. –
Ruler std::cout << std::endl
is indeed the idiomatic way. I would never write std::endl(std::cout)
in real code, since it's unfamiliar. I was just explaining how it works under the hood. –
Warfare operator <<
, e.g. std::cout << "The temperature is " << std::fixed << std::right << std::setw(5) << std::setprecision(2) << temperature << std::endl;
; For direct function calls, you'd always need to use multiple statements or operator ,
to avoid ordering issues. –
Fritz Read the ref:
std::endl
Inserts a new-line character and flushes the stream.
It's used with a stream, for example std::cout
.
It's not a function, it's a function template.
std::endl
without parentheses refers to a set of overload functions - all possible specializations of that function template. Read more in How does std::endl not use any brackets if it is a function?
std::endl()
–
Garnes However, how can a function be deprived of parentheses?
The name of a function, without being followed by ()
, is just a reference to that function. It's exactly the same as with any other type:
void foo(int) {}
char x = 'a';
char *p = &x;
int main()
{
p; // Refers to p
*p; // Dereferences p (refers to whatever p points to)
foo; // Refers to foo
foo(42); // Calls foo
}
std::endl
is a function (actually a function template) which takes one parameter of type "a stream", and works by inserting an EOL representation into that stream and then flushing it. You can actually use it like any other function, if you want to:
std::endl(std::cout);
The final piece of the puzzle is that the standard library provides an overload (again, a template) of operator <<
such that the LHS argument is a stream and the RHS argument is a function; the implementation of this operator calls the RHS argument (the function) and passes it the LHS one (the stream). Conceptually, there's something like this:
Stream& operator<< (Stream &s, const Function &f)
{
f(s);
return s;
}
Therefore, calling std::cout << std::endl
invokes that operator overload, which in turn invokes std::endl(std::cout)
, which does the EOL insertion + flushing.
As to which form is to be preferred (direct call vs. <<
operator), it's definitely the use of <<
. It's idiomatic, and it allows easy composition of multiple stream manipulators within a single expression. Like this:
std::cout << "Temperature: " << std::fixed << std::setprecision(3) << temperature << " (rounds to " << std::setprecision(1) << temperature << ')' << std::endl;
std::cout << std::endl(std::cout)
gives an error, or am I doing something wrong? –
Ruler std::endl(std::cout);
instead of std::cout << std::endl;
as a single statement. –
Literary std::endl(std::cout)
function to stream std::cout
, and that's stream reference, so you are doing something like std::cout << std::cout
, with intermission of sending also EOL to the stream by the endl
function. I.e. doesn't make that much sense. –
Box std::endl(std::cout)
anywhere. Just call it like a plain old function. –
Warfare std::cout << std::endl
is effectively syntactic sugar for calling std::endl(std::cout)
, which inserts the newline & flushes the stream. –
Warfare std::cout << std::endl
at least. –
Ruler std::cout << std::endl
is indeed the idiomatic way. I would never write std::endl(std::cout)
in real code, since it's unfamiliar. I was just explaining how it works under the hood. –
Warfare operator <<
, e.g. std::cout << "The temperature is " << std::fixed << std::right << std::setw(5) << std::setprecision(2) << temperature << std::endl;
; For direct function calls, you'd always need to use multiple statements or operator ,
to avoid ordering issues. –
Fritz endl is an output-only I/O manipulator.
endl is an output-only I/O manipulator, it may be called with an expression such as
out << std::endl
for any out of typestd::basic_ostream
.Inserts a newline character into the output sequence os and flushes it as if by calling
os.put(os.widen('\n'))
followed byos.flush()
.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
+
, or an aray without a[]
, or a string without aprintf
. You pass it around, put it aside, then when its time comes, you retrieve it and stick it in front of a list of arguments. (Technically you are oassing a function pointer or reference around, but this is not important at this moment). – Lippmann