One API I have to use for my app only supports ECDHE ciphers for TLS connections.
PORT STATE SERVICE
443/tcp open https
| ssl-enum-ciphers:
| TLSv1.2:
| ciphers:
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 (rsa 2048) - A
| TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 (rsa 2048) - A
| compressors:
| NULL
| cipher preference: server
|_ least strength: A
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 15.16 seconds
It looks like my app doesn't support those, I get:
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Received fatal alert: handshake_failure
Here's the list of ciphers I can see in the logs:
"ClientHello": {
"client version" : "TLSv1.2",
"random" : "FE 6E D4 06 07 51 D0 66 1A 6A B8 60 84 B0 C7 9F 07 82 8F 92 13 48 2A 72 DC BD 80 39 B9 33 7A 1D",
"session id" : "8C 37 D0 37 88 6C D6 5C 59 94 5B AD E6 6E 0F 50 1D F2 9E 06 F6 17 3F 85 44 AB 12 82 E1 1F F5 53",
"cipher suites" : "[TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384(0x1302), TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256(0x1301), TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256(0x1303), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384(0x009F), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256(0xCCAA), TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384(0x00A3), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256(0x009E), TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256(0x00A2), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256(0x006B), TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256(0x006A), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256(0x0067), TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256(0x0040), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA(0x0039), TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA(0x0038), TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA(0x0033), TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA(0x0032), TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384(0x009D), TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256(0x009C), TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256(0x003D), TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256(0x003C), TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA(0x0035), TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA(0x002F), TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV(0x00FF)]",
And my Dockerfile
FROM alpine:3.10 as jdk-14-alpine
# Add the musl-based JDK 14 distribution
RUN apk update \
&& apk add wget \
&& apk --no-cache add ca-certificates
RUN wget -q https://download.java.net/java/early_access/alpine/12/binaries/openjdk-14-ea+12_linux-x64-musl_bin.tar.gz && \
echo "f6247b208eae214562ec69ec928a238ec26a15b7d18a435523c3ceb3f3f18a7c *openjdk-14-ea+12_linux-x64-musl_bin.tar.gz" | sha256sum -c -
RUN tar -x -f openjdk-14-ea+12_linux-x64-musl_bin.tar.gz -C /opt
RUN rm openjdk-14-ea+12_linux-x64-musl_bin.tar.gz
# Set up env variables
ENV JAVA_HOME=/opt/jdk-14
ENV PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin
# Strip away unnecessary parts of the JDK
# The java.desktop module is needed because Jersey's RenderedImageProvider references java.awt.image.RenderedImage
# The java.sql module is needed because Snakeyaml's Tag references java.sql.Date
RUN jlink --module-path /opt/jdk-14/jmods \
--add-modules java.base,java.logging,java.xml,jdk.unsupported,java.desktop,java.management,java.naming,java.sql,jdk.jdi,jdk.jdwp.agent \
--compress 2 \
--no-header-files \
--output /opt/jdk-14-alpine-linked
CMD ["/opt/jdk-14-alpine-linked/bin/java", "-version"]
FROM alpine:3.10
# Copy the stripped JDK 14 from the previous stage
COPY --from=jdk-14-alpine /opt/jdk-14-alpine-linked /opt/jdk-14
COPY --from=jdk-14-alpine /opt/jdk-14-alpine-linked /opt/jre-14
ENV JAVA_HOME=/opt/jre-14
ENV PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin
# Add the application jar file
ADD target/app-backend.jar /opt/app/app-backend.jar
ADD run.sh /opt/app/run.sh
RUN chmod +x /opt/app/run.sh
CMD ["sh", "/opt/app/run.sh"]
I tried to enable unlimited security by adding
Security.setProperty("crypto.policy", "unlimited");
But it didn't make a difference. I also tried to add bouncycastle in my pom file and I instead got:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not generate XDH keypair
This could be fixed by applying the solution described here but then I get back to the initial error.
Any idea of what I could do? I works on my local machine, it's only when I deploy that the issue appears.
This app is using Apache http so an alternative would be to inject support for these ciphers directly at that level. Can it be done?
crypto.policy
? AFAIK since Java 9 there is no crypto limitation anymore. Anyway if you are using pre-alpha software IMHO Stackoverflow is the wrong place to ask. Use the Java mailing lists. – Kittiekittiwake