How to specify name for resource annotations in compile time?
Asked Answered
M

3

6

Our code has something like this:

@Resource(name = "java:comp/resource/foo/bar/ONE_QUEUE")
private Queue queue;

However, in one deployment scenario the queue annotation should look like this:

@Resource(name = "java:comp/resource/foo/bar/SECOND_QUEUE")
private Queue queue;

I would like to choose the name to use with Maven build profiles.

What options do I have?

Meris answered 18/1, 2010 at 7:59 Comment(0)
N
10

This is not the right way to do things. Resources should be added to the local jndi name of individual EJBs. This is to separate the jndi name used in the bean code from the global jndi bindings set by the bean deployer. The mapping of the bean local jndi binding and the global binding may be handled via the ejb-jar.xml and appserver-specific deployment descriptors.

So, instead, you should declare your @Resource (which is equivalent to a <resource-ref> element indicating resource reference name and type) like this:

@Resource(name = "jms/queue/aQueue")
private Queue queue;

Then, in a appserver-specific deployment descriptor (for GlassFish it's sun-ejb-jar.xml, for JBoss it's jboss.xml, for WebLogic it's weblogic-ejb-jar.xml, etc), declare a <resource-ref> element indicating the resource reference name and the global jndi binding via the <jndi-name> element.

<resource-ref>
  <res-ref-name>jms/queue/aQueue</res-ref-name>
  <jndi-name>resource/foo/bar/ONE_QUEUE</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>

Once you'll get the whole thing working, it will be easy to variabalize this appserver-specific deployment descriptor using Maven for different environments with profiles and filtering. Just use a property, activate filtering of resources, and set different value in profiles. Something like that:

<resource-ref>
  <res-ref-name>jms/queue/aQueue</res-ref-name>
  <jndi-name>${my.jndi.name}</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
Nog answered 18/1, 2010 at 10:24 Comment(0)
V
1

I think you can use maven filtering, although it would feel strange.

Here is an article about this approach.

Vivien answered 18/1, 2010 at 10:15 Comment(0)
R
0

If you don't want to do per-bean config, you could use the JBoss Seam functionality for this (see Seam reference doc). I don't know if this is part of Java Dependency Injection specification (JSR-299) (if you worry about vendor independence).

EDIT: Apparently it is part of JSR-299, see resin's doc about JSR-299

Rushton answered 18/1, 2010 at 14:2 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.