What does it mean that a Git push can not be fast foward merged?
Asked Answered
K

2

6

Can someone please provide a simple example of what would cause a Git push to a central repo to fail because a fast forward could not occur? What would the local repo vs the central repo's state need to look like in order for this to occur? Really having trouble visualizing this...

Kings answered 6/8, 2012 at 19:6 Comment(1)
Excellent question! Many people don't understand that, but most questions I found in this are aren't written that well.Goldfinch
O
11

I assume you're seeing this problem:

 ! [rejected]        master -> master (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to '/Users/mayoff/t/test/central'
To prevent you from losing history, non-fast-forward updates were rejected
Merge the remote changes (e.g. 'git pull') before pushing again.  See the
'Note about fast-forwards' section of 'git push --help' for details.

Here's how the “non-fast-forward updates were rejected” problem happens.

Let's say Alice and Bob are working on a project. They each have a repository, and there's a central repository they both push to and pull from. Initially, the three repositories look like this:

initial synchronized repos

Now Alice and Bob both do some work. Each commits a different change to their local repository:

private repos have new commits

Next, Alice pushes her change to the central repo:

central repo updated by Alice

Next, Bob tries to push. The central repo's master branch points at commit 3. Bob's push tries to update it to point at commit 4. Since commit 4 doesn't have commit 3 as an ancestor, a merge is required, but git push doesn't do real merges. It only does “fast-forwards”, where the new master has the old master as an ancestor. So Bob gets the error because he's trying to push something that requires a real merge, not a fast-forward.

To push successfully, Bob has to first fetch the new commit from the central repo:

Bob has fetched Alice's commit

and he has to merge his changes (commit #4) with Alice's changes (commit #3), creating a new commit that has both commits as ancestors:

Bob has merged the commits

The fetch and merge can be done in two commands (git fetch followed by git merge) or in one command (git pull).

Now Bob can push successfully, because the central repo sees that the new master has the old master as an ancestor.

Bob pushed the merge

Notice that now Alice is missing Bob's commits. If she makes more commits to her repo and tries to push before pulling from the central repo, she'll get the non-fast-forward error, and she'll have to fetch and merge to fix it, just like Bob did.

Opiumism answered 6/8, 2012 at 20:15 Comment(3)
I just realized all my arrows point the wrong way. Oh well. Hopefully it's clear enough.Opiumism
Well, now they show the development in time and not the git tree. That's also not too bad.Goldfinch
consistency is the key. and pointing in the direction of advancing time may actually be more comfortable for some people.Stud
R
0

Simply make make a commit on the central repo on the same branch without pulling to your local one. Then commit locally and try to push.

Rickierickman answered 6/8, 2012 at 19:59 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.