What is the log4j 2 equivalent of the following log4j 1.2 configuration?
<filter class="org.apache.log4j.varia.LevelRangeFilter">
<param name="LevelMin" value="DEBUG" />
<param name="LevelMax" value="INFO" />
</filter>
What is the log4j 2 equivalent of the following log4j 1.2 configuration?
<filter class="org.apache.log4j.varia.LevelRangeFilter">
<param name="LevelMin" value="DEBUG" />
<param name="LevelMax" value="INFO" />
</filter>
Instead of having to create your own filter (http://bitfish.eu/java/log4j-2-multiple-appenders-with-different-log-levels/) you can simply use a composite filter with two ThresholdFilters:
<Filters>
<ThresholdFilter level="DEBUG"/>
<ThresholdFilter level="WARN" onMatch="DENY" onMismatch="NEUTRAL"/>
</Filters>
.properties
file instead of xml –
Melleta We can use below Filter.
<LevelRangeFilter minLevel="DEBUG" maxLevel="DEBUG" onMatch="ACCEPT" onMismatch="DENY"/>
Following appender configurations help to separate writing to stdout and stderr (useful e.g. within eclipse whose console displays the stderr in red).
log4j2 V2.19
<Console name="stdout" target="SYSTEM_OUT">
<PatternLayout ...
<LevelRangeFilter minLevel="INFO" maxLevel="ALL" onMatch="ACCEPT" onMismatch="DENY"/>
</Console>
<Console name="stderr" target="SYSTEM_ERR">
<PatternLayout ...
<LevelRangeFilter minLevel="FATAL" maxLevel="WARN" onMatch="ACCEPT" onMismatch="DENY"/>
</Console>
One remark on the min/max-Level property: it's somehow contra-intuitive, since FATAL is the smallest, ALL is the highest level.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.