trivially default constructible std::optional and std::variant
Asked Answered
K

2

6

Is it permitable to design std::optional (currently std::experimental::optional) in such a way, that for trivially default constructible type T corresponding std::optional< T > is also trivially default constructible?

The same question regading std::variant and its integral discriminator.

My own answer is: "No, it cannot be designed in this way, because value of its integral discriminator obtained during default initialization will be indeterminate if the object has automatic storage duration or if it is reinterpret_cast-ed from non-zero-initialized storage." Requirement to the user to do value-initialization every time is not allowed on my mind.

Krieger answered 3/12, 2015 at 8:29 Comment(3)
Can I ask you in exchange why it is important to you? I can imagine why you would optional to be trivially-copyable. But why trivially-default-constructible? What does it buy you?Allover
@Allover The container (like optional or variant) should be as generic as possible, isn't it? I attempt to design variant for constexpr. And currently it has above ability. But I think "maybe I should to deny it?".Krieger
@Allover Eventually I found a "bug" in my variant. Default initialized objects has different behaviour in compile time (constexpr) and runtime. Then I read about intiializations. And found out, that there is UB to use my default intiialized variant on the stack.Krieger
A
8

Your answer is correct: you cannot. The specification requires that its "initialized flag" is set to false upon default construction.

Allover answered 3/12, 2015 at 9:4 Comment(0)
B
4

As you explained yourself, you can't implement std::optional in such a way, because you would change its semantics (is_trivially_default_constructible is part of the class interface).

However, if you require this semantic for some reason in your code, there is no reason, why you couldn't implement a very similar optional class that is trivially default constructible. Then, when used, just zero initialize it via {} and - if that is what you want - treat zero as true in the bool operator.

Bellew answered 3/12, 2015 at 9:26 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.