I'm trying to write a test that simulates a "broker down" phase. Therefore I want to
- start a local broker
- send message1
- stop the broker
- send message2 (which will of course not arrive)
- start the broker again
- send message3
According to http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-restart-embedded-broker.html it is recommended to init a new BrokerService to start the broker again. So the code looks (almost) like this:
private BrokerService _broker;
private void startBroker() throws Exception {
_broker = new BrokerService();
_broker.addConnector("vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false");
_broker.start();
_broker.waitUntilStarted();
}
private void stopBroker() throws Exception {
_broker.stop();
_broker.waitUntilStopped();
}
@Test
public void publishMessagesWithServerBreakdownInBetween()
throws Exception
{
startBroker();
... send and receive message (works fine)
stopBroker();
... send message (fails of course)
startBroker(); // this fails with java.io.IOException: VMTransportServer already bound at: vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false
... send and receive message
}
The problem is already mentioned as comment in code: The restart of the broker fails due to the error : java.io.IOException: VMTransportServer already bound at: vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false
I found a similar problem at ActiveMQ forum (http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VMTransportServer-already-bound-td2364603.html), but in my case the hostname isn't null.
Another idea was to set 2 different broker names, but that also didn't help.
What am I doing wrong?