Rails: Using build with a has_one association in rails
Asked Answered
W

3

154

In this example, I create a user with no profile, then later on create a profile for that user. I tried using build with a has_one association but that blew up. The only way I see this working is using has_many. The user is supposed to only have at most one profile.

I have been trying this. I have:

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :profile
end

class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :user
end

But when I do:

user.build_profile 

I get the error:

ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: Unknown column 'profiles.user_id' in 'where clause': SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 4)  LIMIT 1

Is there a way in rails to have 0 or 1 association?

Whittling answered 18/3, 2010 at 20:1 Comment(1)
what exactly did you try? could you, please, post some code?Transgression
P
389

The build method signature is different for has_one and has_many associations.

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :profile
  has_many :messages
end

The build syntax for has_many association:

user.messages.build

The build syntax for has_one association:

user.build_profile  # this will work

user.profile.build  # this will throw error

Read the has_one association documentation for more details.

Pathan answered 18/3, 2010 at 21:0 Comment(5)
The different syntax for the has_one always catches me out... dammit!Cormick
It's funny how the top rated and accepted answer here is answering a different question from the one the OP asked.Nikaniki
Supposedly if user belonged to profile(meaning user table has foreign_key profile_id in its table) then also building profile for user will work as mentioned above i.e but for new action only user.build_profile for edit user.build_profile if user.profile.nil? and if you want to build profile while creating user then write accepts_nested_attributes_for :profile this in User model. and in form which user is being created write <%= f.simple_fields_for :profile do |p| %> this and go on.Annual
but why this different behavior was kept for has_one or has_many? There would be some reason while designing, I think and expect.Linda
@Nikaniki the answer matches the question's title but not the body. Given that this (build_<association>) is a quite weird and unexpected behaviour in Rails, there's a lot more people looking for this answer than the actual questions' answer, if you know what I mean.Oestrogen
D
19

Take a good look at the error message. It is telling you that you do not have required column user_id in the profile table. Setting the relationships in the model is only part of the answer.

You also need to create a migration that adds the user_id column to the profile table. Rails expects this to be there and if it is not you cannot access the profile.

For more information please take a look at this link:

Association Basics

Daffie answered 19/3, 2010 at 4:44 Comment(3)
I just figured out my problem. The book I am learning from didn't explain the foreign key creation very well. I created a new migration which adds a foreign key to my model. thanks.Whittling
Do you need to create the column yourself every time? I had this idea that it happened automagically. I don't know where I got that idea.Comedy
You can add the column when generate a model using command line, something like rails g model profile user:references:index address:string bio:text.Kawasaki
C
-14

It should be a has_one. If build isn't working, you can just use new:

ModelName.new( :owner => @owner )

is the same as

@owner.model_names.build
Commutator answered 18/3, 2010 at 20:45 Comment(1)
This isn't the same: if you create a new model_name with build, when @owner is saved then the new model_name will be saved too. So, you can use build to make a parent and children which will get saved together. This isn't the case if you make a model_name with .newOestrogen

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.