I have XAMPP 1.7.3a running on an "Amazon Linux" (Centos-derived) 32-bit instance in the Amazon EC2 cloud. I downloaded/built/installed XDEBUG 2.1.0. The relevant items in phpinfo() output look like this:
Directive Local Value Master Value
xdebug.idekey ECLIPSE_DBGP ECLIPSE_DBGP
xdebug.default_enable On On
xdebug.remote_autostart On On
xdebug.remote_connect_back Off Off
xdebug.remote_cookie_expire_time 3600 3600
xdebug.remote_enable On On
xdebug.remote_handler dbgp dbgp
xdebug.remote_host 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
xdebug.remote_mode req req
xdebug.remote_port 9000 9000
xdebug.remote_log /opt/lampp/logs/xdebug_log
/opt/lampp/logs/xdebug_log
I access the Linux box from a Windows laptop running XP SP3, using the SSH client in PuTTY version 0.60. Also on the laptop I've installed Eclipse PDT (Helios Service Release 1 Build id: 20100917-0705), and I think I've got it configured correctly to do XDEBUG remote debugging using port 9000. I say I think, because I've had difficulty figuring out how to do that, and how to use Eclipse PDT in general. But I did manage to get it configured and working for "remote" debugging of PHP code run by web pages served using XAMPP for Windows 1.7.3 on localhost (127.0.0.1), using port 9000. The phpinfo() output for the server on the laptop which PDT is able to debug is the same as above, except for:
xdebug.idekey my_username no value
xdebug.remote_host localhost localhost
xdebug.remote_log no value no value
I'm pretty sure these differences are not related to the problem. In fact, xdebug.idekey was originally "root novalue" on Linux, which I then changed to ECLIPSE_DBGP by both editing php.ini and setting environment variable DBGP_IDEKEY in the sudo-ed script that starts apache, in vain hope of getting things working.
I've got firewalls and a NAT router between the laptop and the Linux box. So I am trying to use port forwarding through a PuTTY ssh tunnel to get the Linux XDEBUG talking to the Windows PDT. I've been using X11 forwarding with PuTTY for a couple of months with no problems at all. I set up the tunnel in PuTTY with local port 9000 forwarded to port 9000 on the Linux box, and port 9000 on the Linux box forwarded to port 9000 on 127.0.0.1, the PuTTY tunnel panel showing:
L9000 host...amazonaws.com:9000
R9000 127.0.0.1:9000
Looking at the PuTTY Event Log when the tunnel is set up, there appear to be no problems:
2010-11-16 18:07:59 Local port 9000 forwarding to host...amazonaws.com:9000
2010-11-16 18:07:59 Requesting remote port 9000 forward to 127.0.0.1:9000
2010-11-16 18:07:59 Remote port forwarding from 9000 enabled
But then when I go to PDT and click Debug on a configuration that specifies the remote web server, PDT shows background activity in the lower right corner that gets stuck at 57%, and if I click the icon to go to Progress view, that shows "Launching: waiting for XDebug session".
When this happens, the PuTTY Event Log shows:
2010-11-16 19:05:42 Received remote port 9000 open request from 127.0.0.1:54474
2010-11-16 19:05:42 Attempting to forward remote port to 127.0.0.1:9000
2010-11-16 19:05:42 Forwarded port opened successfully
2010-11-16 19:05:42 Opening forwarded connection to host...amazonaws.com:9000
2010-11-16 19:05:42 Forwarded connection refused by server: Connect failed [Connection refused]
2010-11-16 19:05:42 Forwarded port closed
On the Linux box, /var/log/secure just shows:
Nov 16 19:01:51 ip-10-194-9-67 sshd[14555]: error: connect_to host...amazonaws.com port 9000: failed.
I've checked my /etc/ssh/sshd_config, and I think it's okay, even changing it explicitly to "AllowTcpForwarding yes", even though that is supposed to be the default. In my web searches for a solution, I did come across one linuxquestions posting where the final reply says something rather cryptic about sshd needing to resolve a hostname:
this seemed to fix it: The hostname has always been domain-serv, since I always thought of my router as being domain.com...so after running
hostname domain.com
...bam! It finally works...I guess sometimes it is too simple. sshd had to be resolving domain.com to my router, ergo the connection failed.
I sounds like this might be related to my problem, but it makes no sense to me, and since it's pretty old, and the author didn't seem to understand it, either, I thought I would ask here rather than there...
I did notice that a similar question was asked in this forum almost a year ago that got just one 0-value response, presumably because the question was so lacking in detail as to be unanswerable. I hope this one has enough information, and isn't so long, so that somebody can steer me right. After reading the faqs and how to ask a question, it wasn't entirely obvious to me whether the correct use of the forum was to post something under that original poorly-asked but content-identical question, or to post this new one - I'm sure someone will let me know what was the right choice on that :-)
I've been going nuts with this thing, and I suspect it's something pretty obvious to someone with experience. I'm a noob to most of this stuff (PHP, web programming, network admin, and this forum), though not to old-fashioned C programming and user-level Linux and Windows setup.