How to use dependency injection and the repository pattern with ASP.NET web services?
Asked Answered
F

7

7

With regular ASP.NET MVC pages, the repository is passed in to the constructor of the control. Then the tests can instantiate the controller passing in a mock repository.

How can I do this with web services? The problem I see is that we don't have the equivalent of ControllerBuilder.SetControllerFactory.

What are the best practices to get my IoC framework (Castle) to instantiate my web service with the correct repository implementation?

I thought there might be a way to extend HttpHandler and change the way the web service is actually instantiated. I believe this is how the MVC framework does it.

Fritts answered 20/9, 2009 at 0:7 Comment(2)
Which technology are you using to implement your web services? ASP.NET Web Services or Windows Communication Foundation?Garneau
ASP.NET Web Services. However, after reading jrista's answer I think it might be worth it to look into WCF if I really want to inject dependencies. I'm considering just having two constructors - one that takes the repository as parameters (the tests will call this one) and a default one that will hard code :this(new IRepository) and will be called by the ASP.NET framework.Pearlene
B
2

I believe you are looking for the Castle Windsor WCF Integration Facility. It provides a ServiceHost implementation that takes over the construction process of your service implementations, utilizing the Windsor IOC. You can inject dependencies like any other IoC app using this facility, and conveniently enough, its part of the Castle project:

http://www.castleproject.org/container/facilities/trunk/wcf/index.html

If the Castle Project version does not do what you need it to do, I have my own facility that I created to do the same thing for Windsor before I found the Castle project's version. They both generally do the same thing, but both also approach the problem a little differently.

Backwash answered 24/9, 2009 at 23:21 Comment(3)
I guess the answer is "you can't use constructor injection with ASP.NET web services", so either use BuildUp(this) or use WCF with castle.Pearlene
Actually, you should be able to use Castle Windsor with ASMX style services (if that is what you mean). I thought you were asking about WCF, but I don't see why you couldn't integrate Windsor into the ASMX pipeline as well. It is probably not quite as easy as with WCF, but it shouldn't be impossible.Backwash
@Backwash since ServiceHost is not allowed in asmx file, do you have any example on how to implement DI for asmx services?Malinger
C
2

I think that if you are creating web services using .asmx files, it is impossible to use constructor injection. If you were using WCF to implement the web service instead, then I think that it is possible.

In my .asmx web service I let the DI container set the dependencies by setting properties. As my application is also a web form ASP.NET application, than is how I have to do it, because I cannot use constructor injection on web forms either. But I'm using StructureMap, and it has a BuildUp function that can set properties of an already created object. Not as clean as constructor injection, but a good compromise.

But the web services differentiate themselves from the web forms, because I can place the buildup outside of the web form, in the Application_PostMapRequestHandler event. But I have not found out an event that is triggered after the web service class is created. Thus in the constructor of my web service, I have the following code

ObjectFactory.BuildUp(this);

And that is an anti pattern. A class that is initialized by a DI container should not know of the DI container itself. But I have not yet found a better solution.

Conscription answered 20/9, 2009 at 7:6 Comment(0)
B
2

I believe you are looking for the Castle Windsor WCF Integration Facility. It provides a ServiceHost implementation that takes over the construction process of your service implementations, utilizing the Windsor IOC. You can inject dependencies like any other IoC app using this facility, and conveniently enough, its part of the Castle project:

http://www.castleproject.org/container/facilities/trunk/wcf/index.html

If the Castle Project version does not do what you need it to do, I have my own facility that I created to do the same thing for Windsor before I found the Castle project's version. They both generally do the same thing, but both also approach the problem a little differently.

Backwash answered 24/9, 2009 at 23:21 Comment(3)
I guess the answer is "you can't use constructor injection with ASP.NET web services", so either use BuildUp(this) or use WCF with castle.Pearlene
Actually, you should be able to use Castle Windsor with ASMX style services (if that is what you mean). I thought you were asking about WCF, but I don't see why you couldn't integrate Windsor into the ASMX pipeline as well. It is probably not quite as easy as with WCF, but it shouldn't be impossible.Backwash
@Backwash since ServiceHost is not allowed in asmx file, do you have any example on how to implement DI for asmx services?Malinger
P
0

Define a base class and use property injection in there. Pete already said it, but you would do: ObjectFactory.BuildUp(this);

The difference is that I would put it on a base class for the web services, so its "automatic" for the specific implementations.

That way its one line, so I wouldn't care about it unless you have the explicit need to switch DI containers at runtime (unlikely). If you still need that, just move the call to a separate class that would use the specific DI container.

Phaidra answered 23/9, 2009 at 17:13 Comment(0)
B
0

Is there any reason you can't create a custom class with the desired constructor, then instantiate an object of that class in your asmx, then delegate all action to that object?

I usually create those kinds of objects like this:

var o = CustomClass.Create();

public class CustomClass
{
  public static CustomClass Create()
  {
    return IoC.Resolve<CustomClass>();
  }
}

public static class IoC
{
  public T Resolve<T>()
  {
    return yourStaticReferenceToPreferredContainer.Resolve<T>();
  }
}
Blankenship answered 24/9, 2009 at 23:6 Comment(0)
S
0

What type of services are you creating? If your using WCF I wrote this:

http://davidkiff.co.uk/post/2009/08/28/WCF-Inversion-of-Control-e2809cService-Constructore2809d-and-better-Unit-Testing!.aspx

Stanch answered 24/9, 2009 at 23:14 Comment(0)
L
0

MS actually have a solution to this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff664461(PandP.50).aspx

Lush answered 18/8, 2010 at 11:15 Comment(0)
N
0

To achieve dependency injection in ASP.NET Web Services (ASMX), by creating a custom ServiceFactory that manually resolves dependencies and instantiates your ASMX service with the correct repository implementation. This involves implementing IHttpHandlerFactory and registering your custom factory in the web.config file. Alternatively, you can use the service locator pattern within your ASMX service to resolve dependencies, although this approach is not as clean as constructor injection.

  1. Define your service interface and implementation:

    public class MyWebService : IMyWebService { private readonly IRepository _repository;

    public MyWebService(IRepository repository)
    {
        _repository = repository;
    }
    
    public void MyMethod()
    {
        // Use _repository here
    }
    

    }

2.Create a custom ServiceFactory:

public class MyWebServiceFactory : IHttpHandlerFactory
{
    private readonly IRepository _repository;

    public MyWebServiceFactory(IRepository repository)
    {
        _repository = repository;
    }
public IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string requestType, string url, string pathTranslated)
    {
        return new MyWebService(_repository);
    }
public void ReleaseHandler(IHttpHandler handler)
{
    // Cleanup logic, if needed
}
}

3.Finally, register your custom factory in your web.config:

Nobles answered 15/3, 2024 at 5:4 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2025 — McMap. All rights reserved.