It's possible to create a neural network without a bias neuron... it would work just fine, but for more information I would recommend you see the answers to this question:
Role of Bias in Neural Networks
Update:
the role of the bias neuron in the neural net that attempts to solve model XOR is to minimize the size of the neural net. Usually, for "primitive" (not sure if this is the correct term) logic functions such as AND
, OR
, NAND
, etc, you are trying to create a neural network with 2 input neurons, 2 hidden neurons and 1 output neuron. This can't be done for XOR
because the simplest way you can model an XOR
is with two NAND
s:
You can consider A
and B
as your input neurons, the gate in the middle is your "bias" neuron, the two gates following are your "hidden" neurons and finally you have the output neuron. You can solve XOR
without having a bias neuron, but it would require that you increase the number of hidden neurons to a minimum of 3 hidden neurons. In this case, the 3rd neuron essentially acts as a bias neuron. Here is another question that discusses the bias neuron with regards to XOR
: XOR problem solvable with 2x2x1 neural network without bias?