I have python pandas dataframe, in which a column contains month name.
How can I do a custom sort using a dictionary, for example:
custom_dict = {'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3}
I have python pandas dataframe, in which a column contains month name.
How can I do a custom sort using a dictionary, for example:
custom_dict = {'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3}
Pandas 0.15 introduced Categorical Series, which allows a much clearer way to do this:
First make the month column a categorical and specify the ordering to use.
In [21]: df['m'] = pd.Categorical(df['m'], ["March", "April", "Dec"])
In [22]: df # looks the same!
Out[22]:
a b m
0 1 2 March
1 5 6 Dec
2 3 4 April
Now, when you sort the month column it will sort with respect to that list:
In [23]: df.sort_values("m")
Out[23]:
a b m
0 1 2 March
2 3 4 April
1 5 6 Dec
Note: if a value is not in the list it will be converted to NaN.
An older answer for those interested...
You could create an intermediary series, and set_index
on that:
df = pd.DataFrame([[1, 2, 'March'],[5, 6, 'Dec'],[3, 4, 'April']], columns=['a','b','m'])
s = df['m'].apply(lambda x: {'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3}[x])
s.sort_values()
In [4]: df.set_index(s.index).sort()
Out[4]:
a b m
0 1 2 March
1 3 4 April
2 5 6 Dec
As commented, in newer pandas, Series has a replace
method to do this more elegantly:
s = df['m'].replace({'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3})
The slight difference is that this won't raise if there is a value outside of the dictionary (it'll just stay the same).
s = df['m'].replace({'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3})
works for line 2 as well -- just for the sake of anyone learning pandas like me –
Synergy .apply({'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3}.get)
:) In 0.15 we'll have Categorical Series/columns, so the best way will be to use that and then sort will just work. –
Regain SettingWithCopyWarning
in pandas 0.18.1
is there a new idiom to follow? –
Ferrara df.sort_values("m")
in newer pandas (instead of df.sort("m")
), otherwise you'll get a AttributeError: 'DataFrame' object has no attribute 'sort'
;) –
Filigreed m
column by length of the month's name using pd.Categorical
? –
Zebedee You will soon be able to use sort_values
with key
argument:
pd.__version__
# '1.1.0.dev0+2004.g8d10bfb6f'
custom_dict = {'March': 0, 'April': 1, 'Dec': 3}
df
a b m
0 1 2 March
1 5 6 Dec
2 3 4 April
df.sort_values(by=['m'], key=lambda x: x.map(custom_dict))
a b m
0 1 2 March
2 3 4 April
1 5 6 Dec
The key
argument takes as input a Series and returns a Series. This series is internally argsorted and the sorted indices are used to reorder the input DataFrame. If there are multiple columns to sort on, the key function will be applied to each one in turn. See Sorting with keys.
One simple method is using the output Series.map
and Series.argsort
to index into df
using DataFrame.iloc
(since argsort produces sorted integer positions); since you have a dictionary; this becomes easy.
df.iloc[df['m'].map(custom_dict).argsort()]
a b m
0 1 2 March
2 3 4 April
1 5 6 Dec
If you need to sort in descending order, invert the mapping.
df.iloc[(-df['m'].map(custom_dict)).argsort()]
a b m
1 5 6 Dec
2 3 4 April
0 1 2 March
Note that this only works on numeric items. Otherwise, you will need to workaround this using sort_values
, and accessing the index:
df.loc[df['m'].map(custom_dict).sort_values(ascending=False).index]
a b m
1 5 6 Dec
2 3 4 April
0 1 2 March
More options are available with astype
(this is deprecated now), or pd.Categorical
, but you need to specify ordered=True
for it to work correctly.
# Older version,
# df['m'].astype('category',
# categories=sorted(custom_dict, key=custom_dict.get),
# ordered=True)
df['m'] = pd.Categorical(df['m'],
categories=sorted(custom_dict, key=custom_dict.get),
ordered=True)
Now, a simple sort_values
call will do the trick:
df.sort_values('m')
a b m
0 1 2 March
2 3 4 April
1 5 6 Dec
The categorical ordering will also be honoured when groupby
sorts the output.
ordered=None
by default. If not set, the ordering will be wrong, or break on V23. Max function in particular gives a TypeError (Categorical is not ordered for operation max). –
Fellowman sort_values()
with key
and map
. That is much easier than using Categoricals. And it works with Index too. –
Flagitious use the selected answer! it's newer than this post and is not only the official way to maintain ordered data in pandas, it's better in every respect, including features/performance, etc. Don't use my hacky method I describe below.
I'm only writing this update because people keep upvoting my answer, but it's definitely worse than the accepted one :)
A bit late to the game, but here's a way to create a function that sorts pandas Series, DataFrame, and multiindex DataFrame objects using arbitrary functions.
I make use of the df.iloc[index]
method, which references a row in a Series/DataFrame by position (compared to df.loc
, which references by value). Using this, we just have to have a function that returns a series of positional arguments:
def sort_pd(key=None,reverse=False,cmp=None):
def sorter(series):
series_list = list(series)
return [series_list.index(i)
for i in sorted(series_list,key=key,reverse=reverse,cmp=cmp)]
return sorter
You can use this to create custom sorting functions. This works on the dataframe used in Andy Hayden's answer:
df = pd.DataFrame([
[1, 2, 'March'],
[5, 6, 'Dec'],
[3, 4, 'April']],
columns=['a','b','m'])
custom_dict = {'March':0, 'April':1, 'Dec':3}
sort_by_custom_dict = sort_pd(key=custom_dict.get)
In [6]: df.iloc[sort_by_custom_dict(df['m'])]
Out[6]:
a b m
0 1 2 March
2 3 4 April
1 5 6 Dec
This also works on multiindex DataFrames and Series objects:
months = ['Jan','Feb','Mar','Apr','May','Jun','Jul','Aug','Sep','Oct','Nov','Dec']
df = pd.DataFrame([
['New York','Mar',12714],
['New York','Apr',89238],
['Atlanta','Jan',8161],
['Atlanta','Sep',5885],
],columns=['location','month','sales']).set_index(['location','month'])
sort_by_month = sort_pd(key=months.index)
In [10]: df.iloc[sort_by_month(df.index.get_level_values('month'))]
Out[10]:
sales
location month
Atlanta Jan 8161
New York Mar 12714
Apr 89238
Atlanta Sep 5885
sort_by_last_digit = sort_pd(key=lambda x: x%10)
In [12]: pd.Series(list(df['sales'])).iloc[sort_by_last_digit(df['sales'])]
Out[12]:
2 8161
0 12714
3 5885
1 89238
To me this feels clean, but it uses python operations heavily rather than relying on optimized pandas operations. I haven't done any stress testing but I'd imagine this could get slow on very large DataFrames. Not sure how the performance compares to adding, sorting, then deleting a column. Any tips on speeding up the code would be appreciated!
df.sort_index()
to sort all index levels. –
Indiction import pandas as pd
custom_dict = {'March':0,'April':1,'Dec':3}
df = pd.DataFrame(...) # with columns April, March, Dec (probably alphabetically)
df = pd.DataFrame(df, columns=sorted(custom_dict, key=custom_dict.get))
returns a DataFrame with columns March, April, Dec
I had the same task but with an addition to sort on multiple columns.
One of the solutions is to make both columns pd.Categorical and pass the expected order as an argument "categories".
But I had some requirements where I cannot coerce unknown\unexpected values and unfortunately that is what pd.Categorical is doing. Also None is not supported as a category and coerced automatically.
So my solution was to use a key to sort on multiple columns with a custom sorting order:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame([
[A2, 2],
[B1, 1],
[A1, 2],
[A2, 1],
[B1, 2],
[A1, 1]],
columns=['one','two'])
def custom_sorting(col: pd.Series) -> pd.Series:
"""Series is input and ordered series is expected as output"""
to_ret = col
# apply custom sorting only to column one:
if col.name == "one":
custom_dict = {}
# for example ensure that A2 is first, pass items in sorted order here:
def custom_sort(value):
return (value[0], int(value[1:]))
ordered_items = list(col.unique())
ordered_items.sort(key=custom_sort)
# apply custom order first:
for index, item in enumerate(ordered_items):
custom_dict[item] = index
to_ret = col.map(custom_dict)
# default text sorting is about to be applied
return to_ret
# pass two columns to be sorted
df.sort_values(
by=["two", "one"],
ascending=True,
inplace=True,
key=custom_sorting,
)
print(df)
Output:
5 A1 1
3 A2 1
1 B1 1
2 A1 2
0 A2 2
4 B1 2
Be aware that this solution can be slow.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
pd.Categorical
does not interpret the categories as ordered by default. See this answer. – President