Ok, let's consider a couple of things. First:
type T = { def x: Int }
This type is known as a structural type. It defines not a class, but a set of objects that share methods with a certain type signature. At run-time, it is erased to Object
, and any calls to x
are done through reflection, since Java doesn't have any equivalent to it.
Next:
val a = Array[{ def x: Int }](new { def x = 3 })
Note that you did not use new Array
, but Array
. That is a call to the apply
method of Scala's Array
object. This method requires a ClassManifest
implicit parameter that will tell Scala how to create the array. This is necessary because arrays are not erased in Java, so Scala has to provide the precise type to Java.
And here's the problem: there's no such type in Java.
I do wonder if it wouldn't be possible for Scala to use Object
here. A ticket might be in order, but don't count on it being possible.
List
and anArray
, which should be a hint as to what is going on. – Necessitous