I agree with Alex's answer, but against my better scientific and design judgment, I took a stab at it.
require(gridExtra)
require(dplyr)
iris %>% group_by(Species) %>%
do(gg = {ggplot(., aes(Petal.Width, Petal.Length, fill = Sepal.Width)) +
geom_tile() + facet_grid(~Species) +
guides(fill = guide_colourbar(title.position = "top")) +
theme(legend.position = "top")}) %>%
.$gg %>% arrangeGrob(grobs = ., nrow = 1) %>% grid.arrange()
Of course, then you're duplicating lots of labels, which is annoying. Additionally, you lose the x
and y
scale information by plotting each species as a separate plot, instead of facets of a single plot. You could fix the axes by adding ... + coord_cartesian(xlim = range(iris$Petal.Width), ylim = range(iris$Petal.Length)) + ...
within that ggplot call.
To be honest, the only way this makes sense at all is if it's comparing two different variables for the fill, which is why you don't care about comparing their true value between plots. A good alternative would be rescaling them to percentiles within a facet using dplyr::group_by()
and dplyr::percent_rank
.
Edited to update:
In the two-different-variables case, you have to first "melt" the data, which I assume you've already done. Here I'm repeating it with the iris
data. Then you can look at the relative values by examining the percentiles, rather than the absolute values of the two variables.
iris %>%
tidyr::gather(key = Sepal.measurement,
value = value,
Sepal.Length, Sepal.Width) %>%
group_by(Sepal.measurement) %>%
mutate(percentilevalue = percent_rank(value)) %>%
ggplot(aes(Petal.Length, Petal.Width)) +
geom_tile(aes(fill = percentilevalue)) +
facet_grid(Sepal.measurement ~ Species) +
scale_fill_continuous(limits = c(0,1), labels = scales::percent)