I can call an asp.net mvc controller via Ajax.ActionLink("Get customers","GetCustomers","Customer");
I can do the same with the Html.ActionLink and a jquery ajax call.
Where is the difference?
I can call an asp.net mvc controller via Ajax.ActionLink("Get customers","GetCustomers","Customer");
I can do the same with the Html.ActionLink and a jquery ajax call.
Where is the difference?
Where is the difference?
In the amount of code you have to write (less with Ajax.ActionLink) and the level of control you need (more with Html.ActionLink and a jquery ajax call).
So it's amount of code vs level of control and functionality needed => up to you to decide which one you need.
Both approaches are perfectly fine. The Ajax.ActionLink uses the jquery.unobtrisuve-ajax script to AJAXify the anchor behind the scenes.
Personally I always use Html.ActionLink + jQuery.
No difference if you ask me $.ajax
is what Ajax.ActionLink
is using under the hood as @gdoron mentioned in his answer. Personally using $.ajax
gives a more sense of control... you can manipulate more options available in $.ajax
one plus point for Ajax.ActionLink
is that i think it provides out of the box support of degradation if javascript is disabled never experienced it though but you can explore it...
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.