I am looking for a JavaScript equivalent of the Python:
pass
statement that does not run the function of the ...
notation?
Is there such a thing in JavaScript?
I am looking for a JavaScript equivalent of the Python:
pass
statement that does not run the function of the ...
notation?
Is there such a thing in JavaScript?
Python's pass
mainly exists because in Python whitespace matters within a block. In Javascript, the equivalent would be putting nothing within the block, i.e. {}
.
use //pass
like python's pass
like:
if(condition){
//pass
}
This is equivalent to leaving the block with nothing in it, but is good for readability reasons.
reference from https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-empty
python's pass is required for empty blocks.
try:
# something
except Exception:
pass
In javascript you can simply catch an empty block
try {
// some code
} catch (e) {
// This here can be empty
}
Javascript does not have a python pass
equivalent, unfortunately.
For example, it is not possible in javascript to do something like this:
process.env.DEV ? console.log('Connected..') : pass
Instead, we must do this:
if (process.env.DEV) console.log('Connected..')
The advantage of using the pass
statement, among others, is that in the course of the development process we can evolve from the above ternary operator example in this case without having to turn it into a full if
statement.
pass
in a conditional expression, you would have to use a conditional statement –
Pentylenetetrazol you could create a function that actually does nothing.
const pass = () => {}
try {
pass()
} else {
console.log('helloworld!')
}
I know this is a very old question but i guess that is also possible to do something like this.
You can declare a constant that contains a string (or something else).
const pass = 'pass';
const pass = null;
may also be good.
if (condition) {
pass
} else {
console.log('hi!');
}
However note also that this may be a better option.
if (condition) {}
else {
console.log('cool!');
}
Python doesn't have brackets to determine where the blocks of code are like javascript, so an empty block throws error (that's why you put the pass
statement in empty blocks). What i have done by answering this question is just creating a constant using it as if it was a statement. The concept is really near to python's substitution of pass with ellipsis.
Someone in python prefers to use ...
instead of pass
.
if condition:
...
else:
print('Python!')
In some cases pass
can just be ;
A real life example can be:
var j;
for (j = i + 1; j < binstrN.length && binstrN[j] != 1; j++) {
}
let count = j - i;
is same as
var j;
for (j = i + 1; j < binstrN.length && binstrN[j] != 1; j++);
let count = j - i;
Here we are trying to move j
to next '1', while i
was already at a '1' before it, hence count
gives the distance between first two '1's in the string binary string binstrN
An easy way for passing an if statement is entering a string. 'pass' is more readible.
if(true){
'pass'
}
If you want to just use the pass operator in a ternary operator or just in an if statement in JS, you can do this:
a === true && (console.log('okay'))
You can also use the opposite of && which is the || operator. Then if you want to use Pass in a function or a block in general as we do in Python like this:
def Func(): pass
In JS if it's an if/else statement, you don't need to have that block at all that would pass, you just don't add it:
if(condition) {
console.log('ok')
}
/* else {} remove it! /
And if it's a function that you are planning to implement later, you can throw an error inside it, that way if you use it, you get a nice error that reminds you to implement it.
function getUser() {
throw "Not Implemented Yet";
}
In the end, there are no braces in Python, which is why we have a pass.
I've found that I get an error with empty braces, instead I put a semicolon in there, basically the same thing:
try { //something; } catch (err) { ; }
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
{}
empty braces the same thing ? – Stopgapnull
is sometimes used for that, as inif (condition) null;
– Coy