TL;DR: Yes, if you use the right svn2git
tool
For a one-time migration git-svn
is not the right tool for conversions of repositories or parts of a repository. It is a great tool if you want to use Git as frontend for an existing SVN server, but for one-time conversions you should not use git-svn
, but svn2git
which is much more suited for this use-case.
There are plenty tools called svn2git
, the probably best one is the KDE one from https://github.com/svn-all-fast-export/svn2git. I strongly recommend using that svn2git
tool. It is the best I know available out there and it is very flexible in what you can do with its rules files.
You will be easily able to configure svn2git
s rule file to produce the result you want from your current SVN layout, including any complex histories that might exist and including producing several Git repos out of one SVN repo or combining different SVN repos into one Git repo cleanly in one run if you like and also excluding any paths or branches or tags you don't to have migrated, though I'm always crying a little if someone discards code history which is precious.
If you are not 100% about the history of your repository, svneverever
from http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=763 is a great tool to investigate the history of an SVN repository when migrating it to Git.
Even though git-svn
or the nirvdrum svn2git
is easier to start with, here are some further reasons why using the KDE svn2git
instead of git-svn
is superior, besides its flexibility:
- the history is rebuilt much better and cleaner by
svn2git
(if the correct one is used), this is especially the case for more complex histories with branches and merges and so on
- the tags are real tags and not branches in Git
- with
git-svn
the tags contain an extra empty commit which also makes them not part of the branches, so a normal fetch
will not get them until you give --tags
to the command as by default only tags pointing to fetched branches are fetched also. With the proper svn2git tags are where they belong
- if you changed layout in SVN you can easily configure this with
svn2git
, with git-svn
you will loose history eventually
- with
svn2git
you can also split one SVN repository into multiple Git repositories easily
- or combine multiple SVN repositories in the same SVN root into one Git repository easily
- the conversion is a gazillion times faster with the correct
svn2git
than with git-svn
You see, there are many reasons why git-svn
is worse and the KDE svn2git
is superior. :-)
svn2git
orgit svn
have any commands in which you can specify revisions? For examplesvn2git -r 1:72, 79-100
effectively skipping revisions 73-78? – Silverweedgit svn
a starting and ending revision but not skip revision in between. But even if that would be possible, it would be quite a job to list all the revisions to skip. So that wouldn't be an option for me. – Tree--{in,ex}clude-paths
options ongit svn fetch
(and…init
, and…clone
). The docs for those give examples of how to specify what you want to take and/or exclude, is there some specific problem with that? – Brahmaputra