I have this simple Hibernate code.
public List<Student>bug(){
//SimpleCriteria
final Criterion eq = and(Restrictions.eq("fdl","N"),Restrictions.eq("cid",1),Restrictions.eq("did",2));
return currentSession().createCriteria(Student.class)
.createAlias("school","s",JoinType.INNER_JOIN,Restrictions.eq("zipCode",1764))
.createAlias("address","a",JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN,eq)
.setProjection(addProjection("id"))
.setResultTransformer(transformer(Student.class))
.list();
}
The problem is the parameters and somehow disorder or mixed or in a wrong position each one the problem arises when i create two createAlias both with at least a criterion like this(See Update below)
createAlias With Some Criterions
createAlias("school","s",JoinType.INNER_JOIN,Restrictions.eq("zipCode",1764))
createAlias("address","a",JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN,eq)
The sql generated seems good..
select
this_.ID as y0_
from
student this_
left outer join
address address2_
on this_.C05=address2_.ID
and (
(
address2_.FDL=?
and address2_.CID=?
and address2_.DID=?
)
)
inner join
school school_
on this_.C03=school_.ID
and (
school_.C06=? //ZIPCODE
)
Even when i see the log4j i can see the wrong binding
You can see the zip code value 1764 is bind to the first parameter which is address2_.FDL
binding parameter [1] as [INTEGER] - [1764]
Later the second parameter which is cid is assigned the correct previous value for fdl which is 'N'
Message: binding parameter [2] as [VARCHAR] - [N]
Later the third parameter which is did is assigned the correct previous value for cid which is 1
binding parameter [3] as [INTEGER] - [1]
Later the four parameter which is zipCode is assigned the correct previous value for did which is 2
binding parameter [4] as [INTEGER] - [2]
Of course the generatedsql match log4j binding
select
this_.ID as y0_
from
student this_
left outer join
address address2_
on this_.C05=address2_.ID
and (
(
address2_.FDL=1764
and address2_.CID='N'
and address2_.DID=1
)
)
inner join
school school_
on this_.C03=school_.ID
and (
school_.C06=2 //ZIPCODE
)
As you can see the binding is clearly wrong.
Expected<---------------->Reality
1 parameter fdl should be bind to 'N' but is bind to zipCode value which is 1764
2 parameter cid should be bind to 1 but is bind to fdl value which is 'N'
3 parameter did should be bind to 2 but is bind to cid value which is 1
4 parameter zipCode should be bind to 1764 but is bind to did value which is 2
What i think is happening Hibernate mix the parameters positions for some reason.
I was using Hibernate 4.3.4 when this problem come across but i see a similiar bug which was fixed in 5.2.2 https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10991 and i upgrade to Hibernate 5.2.2 and the same problem come across i have seen a lot of forum reporting this problem why hibernate doesn't fix it? Of course i have workarounds but this problem is very annoying
If i use the 2 createAlias with not criterion everything works like expected
createAlias("school","s",JoinType.INNER_JOIN,Restrictions.eq("zipCode",1764))
createAlias("address","a",JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN)
Environment
Java: 1.8.0_74; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 25.74-b02
Hibernate 5.2.2 and 4.3.4 tested in both.
Netbeans NetBeans IDE 8.1 (Build 201510222201)
Another similiar forums
https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=947018
https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=971534
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-2496
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-1743
UPDATE
The parameters goes wrong even when are 2 parameters
public List<Student>bug(){
return currentSession().createCriteria(Student.class)
.createAlias("school","s",JoinType.INNER_JOIN,Restrictions.eq("zipCode",1764))
.createAlias("address","a",JoinType.LEFT_OUTER_JOIN,Restrictions.eq("fdl","N"))
.setProjection(addProjection("id"))
.setResultTransformer(transformer(Student.class))
.list();
}
As you can see the binding is clearly wrong.
Expected<---------------->Reality
1 parameter fdl should be bind to 'N' but is bind to zipCode value which is 1764
2 parameter zipCode should be bind to 1764 but is bind to fdl value which is 'N'