System.Interactive: Difference between Memoize() and MemoizeAll()?
Asked Answered
H

1

8

In System.Interactive.dll (v1.0.2521.0) from Reactive Extensions, EnumerableEx has both a Memoize method and a MemoizeAll method. The API documentation is identical for both of them:

Creates an enumerable that enumerates the original enumerable only once and caches its results.

However, these methods are clearly not identical. If I use Memoize, my enumerable has values the first time I enumerate it, and seems to be empty the second time. If I use MemoizeAll then I get the behavior I would expect from the description of either method - I can enumerate the result as many times as I want and get the same results each time, but the source is only enumerated once.

Can anyone tell me what the intended difference between these methods is? What is the use-case for Memoize? It seems like a fairly useless method with really confusing documentation.

Heinrike answered 28/5, 2010 at 18:32 Comment(0)
M
7

to put it really simply, MemoizeAll only caches items that you actually use -- but it holds on to all the cached items forever. Memoize caches items immediately, but only up to the specified buffer size. This lets you be a lot more efficient with memory usage, etc, but you only want to use the latter if you understand how all consumers of the enumerable source will use it.

There's a really great explanation of the difference in this blog post: http://bartdesmet.net/blogs/bart/archive/2010/01/07/more-linq-with-system-interactive-functional-fun-and-taming-side-effects.aspx

Muscular answered 28/5, 2010 at 18:57 Comment(1)
Thanks, that is indeed a good explanation. Maybe future versions of Reactive Extensions will expand the description of Memoize.Heinrike

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.