Difference between with-local-vars and with-bindings in Clojure
Asked Answered
T

2

8

The documentation for Clojure with-local-vars and with-bindings doesn't suffice for me to distinguish the two. Any hints?

Thinner answered 28/8, 2013 at 17:50 Comment(1)
I don't think 'dynamic-binding' is used correctly for your questionNeva
R
12

New vars are temporarily created by with-local-vars. Existing vars are temporarily rebound by with-bindings. In both cases the bindings are thread-local.

Note that with-bindings is, as far as I can tell, primarily useful as a helper to pass bindings from another context by using a map returned by get-thread-bindings. The similar function binding would be more typical when not importing bindings.

Illustrative examples:

(binding [*out* (new java.io.StringWriter)] 
  (print "world!") (str "hello, " *out*))
;=> "hello, world!"

(with-local-vars [*out* (new java.io.StringWriter)] 
  (print "world!") (str "hello," *out*))
;=> world!"hello,#<Var: --unnamed-->"

(with-local-vars [foo (new java.io.StringWriter)] 
  (.write @foo "world") (str "hello, " @foo))
;=> "hello, world"

(binding [foo (new java.io.StringWriter)] 
  (.write @foo "world") (str "hello, " @foo))
;=> CompilerException java.lang.RuntimeException: 
;     Unable to resolve var: foo in this context...
Renner answered 28/8, 2013 at 18:16 Comment(0)
N
2

(with-bindings) expects the keys of the bindings map to be Vars, not symbols. It pushes the given map of var/values onto the stack of thread local bindings and take care to remove it after the given function returned. It is a low level function.

(with-local-vars) allows you to code in imperative style (mutating state).

Neva answered 28/8, 2013 at 18:17 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.