git pull while not in a git directory
Asked Answered
G

9

358

Let's say I have a directory, /X/Y, which is a git repository. Is it possible to somehow call a command like git pull from inside /X, but targeting the /X/Y directory?

EDIT: I guess I was wondering specifically: is it possible to do this using the a git command, but without having to change directories?

NOTE: I've accepted VonC's answer as it's much more elegant than previous options. For people running Git older than 1.8.5, please see bstpierre's answer below.

Geier answered 22/2, 2011 at 19:58 Comment(3)
I'd like to add that when using git-pull within a hook will not work unless you unset GIT_DIR. Relevant.Nickerson
Starting git 1.8.5 (Q4 2013), you will be able to "use a git command, but without having to change directories". See my answer belowPelt
Just use following example command > git -C "<dirPath>" pullOratorian
P
521

Starting git 1.8.5 (Q4 2013), you will be able to "use a Git command, but without having to change directories".

Just like "make -C <directory>", "git -C <directory> ..." tells Git to go there before doing anything else.

See commit 44e1e4 by Nazri Ramliy:

It takes more keypresses to invoke Git command in a different directory without leaving the current directory:

  1. (cd ~/foo && git status)
    git --git-dir=~/foo/.git --work-tree=~/foo status
    GIT_DIR=~/foo/.git GIT_WORK_TREE=~/foo git status
  2. (cd ../..; git grep foo)
  3. for d in d1 d2 d3; do (cd $d && git svn rebase); done

The methods shown above are acceptable for scripting but are too cumbersome for quick command line invocations.

With this new option, the above can be done with fewer keystrokes:

  1. git -C ~/foo status
  2. git -C ../.. grep foo
  3. for d in d1 d2 d3; do git -C $d svn rebase; done

Since Git 2.3.4 (March 2015), and commit 6a536e2 by Karthik Nayak (KarthikNayak), git will treat "git -C '<path>'" as a no-op when <path> is empty.

'git -C ""' unhelpfully dies with error "Cannot change to ''", whereas the shell treats cd ""' as a no-op.
Taking the shell's behavior as a precedent, teach git to treat -C ""' as a no-op, as well.


4 years later, Git 2.23 (Q3 2019) documents that 'git -C ""' works and doesn't change directory

It's been behaving so since 6a536e2 (git: treat "git -C '<path>'" as a no-op when <path> is empty, 2015-03-06, Git v2.3.4).

That means the documentation now (finally) includes:

If '<path>' is present but empty, e.g. -C "", then the current working directory is left unchanged.


You can see git -C used with Git 2.26 (Q1 2020), as an example.

See commit b441717, commit 9291e63, commit 5236fce, commit 10812c2, commit 62d58cd, commit b87b02c, commit 9b92070, commit 3595d10, commit f511bc0, commit f6041ab, commit f46c243, commit 99c049b, commit 3738439, commit 7717242, commit b8afb90 (20 Dec 2019) by Denton Liu (Denton-L).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 381e8e9, 05 Feb 2020)

t1507: inline full_name()

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu

Before, we were running test_must_fail full_name. However, test_must_fail should only be used on git commands.
Inline full_name() so that we can use test_must_fail on the git command directly.

When full_name() was introduced in 28fb84382b ("Introduce <branch>@{upstream} notation", 2009-09-10, Git v1.7.0-rc0 -- merge), the git -C option wasn't available yet (since it was introduced in 44e1e4d67d ("git: run in a directory given with -C option", 2013-09-09, Git v1.8.5-rc0 -- merge listed in batch #5)).
As a result, the helper function removed the need to manually cd each time. However, since git -C is available now, we can just use that instead and inline full_name().

Pelt answered 21/11, 2013 at 8:9 Comment(14)
Does not work for me: # git --version && git -C ~/.m2/ checkout master git version 1.8.3.4 (Apple Git-47) Unknown option: -C usage: git [--version] [--help] [-c name=value] [--exec-path[=<path>]] [--html-path] [--man-path] [--info-path] [-p|--paginate|--no-pager] [--no-replace-objects] [--bare] [--git-dir=<path>] [--work-tree=<path>] [--namespace=<name>] <command> [<args>]Subsellium
@JanGalinski But I did mention "Starting git 1.8.5". So git 1.8.3.x wouldn't know yet about that option.Pelt
On Ubuntu 12.04 I had to install a newer git version. I did it like this: apt-get install software-properties-common python-software-properties then add the git repo add-apt-repository ppa:git-core/ppa. The last step is to update git: apt-get update && apt-get upgrade.Thermolabile
Argh crap CentOS 6.6.Riverside
@avesus no problem: https://mcmap.net/q/22413/-how-to-install-latest-version-of-git-on-centos-8-x-7-x-6-x/6309 or serverfault.com/a/604124/783 or howtoforge.com/how-to-install-the-latest-git-version-on-centosPelt
Doing this on many folders with wildcards does not work... git -C */default pull :-( Anyone?Saturnalia
@Saturnalia I agree, it won't work (even in bash shell). You would need to wrap it with for: https://mcmap.net/q/12803/-multiple-git-pull-in-one-folder-containing-multiple-repository-closedPelt
After various failed attempts e.g --git-dir=foo/.git, --work-tree=foo, the -C option seems to cover it, thanks.Retardant
cannot use the ~ in the path, use the $HOME or full path or relative path will be ok.Extine
@XinMeng Strange: what OS and git version are you using?: ~ works just fine when used with -C.Pelt
@Pelt I am using Fedora 26Extine
@XinMeng And which version of Git?Pelt
@Pelt git version 2.13.6Extine
@XinMeng Seems recent enough. A git -C ~/path/to/other/git/repo remote -v should work.Pelt
D
59

Edit:

There's either a bug with git pull, or you can't do what you're trying to do with that command. You can however, do it with fetch and merge:

cd /X
git --git-dir=/X/Y/.git fetch
git --git-dir=/X/Y/.git --work-tree=/X/Y merge origin/master

Original answer:

Assuming you're running bash or similar, you can do (cd /X/Y; git pull).

The git man page specifies some variables (see "The git Repository") that seem like they should help, but I can't make them work right (with my repository in /tmp/ggg2):

GIT_WORK_TREE=/tmp/ggg2 GIT_DIR=/tmp/ggg2/.git git pull
fatal: /usr/lib/git-core/git-pull cannot be used without a working tree.

Running the command below while my cwd is /tmp updates that repo, but the updated file appears in /tmp instead of the working tree /tmp/ggg2:

GIT_DIR=/tmp/ggg2/.git git pull

See also this answer to a similar question, which demonstrates the --git-dir and --work-tree flags.

Dannielledannon answered 22/2, 2011 at 20:18 Comment(8)
Did you try using just GIT_WORK_TREE?Vial
@Arrowmaster: yes, if you do that, git can't find the .git directory.Dannielledannon
Ah right, the man page says that GIT_WORK_TREE is not used if GIT_DIR is not set. It seems strange that its not working then when both are used.Vial
@Arrowmaster: I have to wonder if there's a bug here somewhere. If I do git --git-dir=/tmp/ggg2/.git --work-tree=/tmp/ggg2 pull, I get an error message. But if I do git --git-dir=/tmp/ggg2/.git --work-tree=. pull while I'm in /tmp, it puts the updated files in /tmp as it should.Dannielledannon
@bstpierre: I don't have access to a system with git installed right now but if I did I would be trying other alternatives with --work-tree right now like --work-tree=/tmp/ggg2/ and --work-tree=/tmp/ggg2/. since it could be an issue with how its parsing the path.Vial
@bstpierre: Also what version of git are you trying this on?Vial
Thanks, your edited answers helped. Spent an hour playing with git pull and various options and cds until I tried your solution and it workedInfusible
I'm using git v1.7.9.5 and git --git-dir=${HOME}/repo/.git pull works fine.Lovegrass
A
34

You may wrap it in a bash script or git alias:

cd /X/Y && git pull && cd -
Aluminous answered 22/2, 2011 at 20:11 Comment(3)
This definitely does the trick, but I'm wondering if there's some way to use the git command without changing directories. I'm starting to think that there isn't.Geier
and use the pushd/popd pair instead of cd/cd-Antemortem
Or you could use a subshell to prevent having to cd back: (cd xyz && git pull)Dinahdinan
A
32

This post is a bit old so could be there was a bug andit was fixed, but I just did this:

git --work-tree=/X/Y --git-dir=/X/Y/.git pull origin branch

And it worked. Took me a minute to figure out that it wanted the dotfile and the parent directory (in a standard setup those are always parent/child but not in ALL setups, so they need to be specified explicitly.

Areopagus answered 5/12, 2012 at 23:3 Comment(1)
I like this solution because it works with directories like \\remotemachine\C$\folder\etcStearic
I
7

As some of my servers are on an old Ubuntu LTS versions, I can't easily upgrade git to the latest version (which supports the -C option as described in some answers).

This trick works well for me, especially because it does not have the side effect of some other answers that leave you in a different directory from where you started.

pushd /X/Y
git pull
popd

Or, doing it as a one-liner:

pushd /X/Y; git pull; popd

Both Linux and Windows have pushd and popd commands.

Intern answered 8/5, 2014 at 6:39 Comment(0)
T
6

Using combination pushd, git pull and popd, we can achieve this functionality:

pushd <path-to-git-repo> && git pull && popd

For example:

pushd "E:\Fake Directory\gitrepo" && git pull && popd
Thermistor answered 5/10, 2018 at 8:23 Comment(1)
this is amazing. Works perfectlyJeaz
F
4

You can write a script like this:

cd /X/Y
git pull

You can name it something like gitpull.
If you'd rather have it do arbitrary directories instead of /X/Y:

cd $1
git pull

Then you can call it with gitpull /X/Z
Lastly, you can try finding repositories. I have a ~/git folder which contains repositories, and you can use this to do a pull on all of them.

g=`find /X -name .git`
for repo in ${g[@]}
do
    cd ${repo}
    cd ..
    git pull
done
Fawne answered 22/2, 2011 at 20:15 Comment(1)
If you want to do it from the command line, just do it in a subshell: (cd /X/Y && git pull).Joaniejoann
M
2

For anyone like me that was trying to do this via a drush (Drupal shell) command on a remote server, you will not be able to use the solution that requires you to CD into the working directory:

Instead you need to use the solution that breaks up the pull into a fetch & merge:

drush @remote exec git --git-dir=/REPO/PATH --work-tree=/REPO/WORKDIR-PATH fetch origin
drush @remote exec git --git-dir=/REPO/PATH --work-tree=/REPO/WORKDIR-PATH merge origin/branch
Metalinguistic answered 9/8, 2012 at 21:26 Comment(0)
B
1

This might be a similar problem, but you can also simply chain you commands. eg

On one line

cd ~/Sites/yourdir/web;git pull origin master

Or via SSH.

ssh [email protected] -t "cd ~/Sites/thedir/web;git pull origin master"
Boldt answered 11/5, 2013 at 2:29 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.