I have an expression: sin(x)+sin(y)
There is a well-known trig identity to express this as the product of sin and cos.
Is there a way to get sympy to apply this identity?
simplify
and trigsimp
do nothing.
I have an expression: sin(x)+sin(y)
There is a well-known trig identity to express this as the product of sin and cos.
Is there a way to get sympy to apply this identity?
simplify
and trigsimp
do nothing.
trigsimp
, as Aristocrates points out, does the reverse, because sin(x) + sin(y)
is simpler than 2*sin((x + y)/2)*cos((x - y)/2)
.
trigsimp
internally uses an algorithm based on a paper by Fu, et. al., which does pattern matching on various trigonometric identities. If you look at the source code, all the identities are written out in individual functions (the functions are named after the sections in Fu's paper).
Looking at the list of simplifications at the top of the file, the one you want is probably
TR9 - contract sums of sin-cos to products
Testing it out, it looks like it works
In [1]: from sympy.simplify.fu import TR9
In [2]: TR9(sin(x) + sin(y))
Out[2]:
⎛x y⎞ ⎛x y⎞
2⋅sin⎜─ + ─⎟⋅cos⎜─ - ─⎟
⎝2 2⎠ ⎝2 2⎠
We would eventually like to factor these out into more user-friendly functions, but for now, the fu.py
file is pretty well documented, even if all the function names are not particularly memorable.
fu
function. You can provide a "measure" function, which lets you redefine what kinds of expressions are "simpler". –
Rhyme There does not seem to be a single function defined. You need to use the individual Fu functions as @asmeurer said. What I can contribute is a pointer to the official documentation explaining this: https://docs.sympy.org/dev/modules/simplify/fu.html
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
trigsimp
seems to work in the other direction, that is,trigsimp(2*sin( (x + y)/2 ) * cos ( (x - y)/2 ))
gives yousin(x) + sin(y)
. Perhaps sympy is interpretingsin(x) + sin(y)
as the "more simplified" form. Do you know of other means of performing trig manipulations in sympy? – Treverexpand_trig(sin(x) + sin(y))
also seems to be doing nothing – Trever