What's the difference between @GetMapping
and @RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
?
I've seen in some Spring Reactive examples, that
@GetMapping
was used instead of @RequestMapping
@GetMapping
is a composed annotation that acts as a shortcut for @RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
.
@GetMapping
is the newer annotaion.
It supports consumes
Consume options are :
consumes = "text/plain"
consumes = {"text/plain", "application/*"}
For Further details see: GetMapping Annotation
or read: request mapping variants
RequestMapping supports consumes as well
GetMapping we can apply only on method level and RequestMapping annotation we can apply on class level and as well as on method level
As you can see here:
Specifically,
@GetMapping
is a composed annotation that acts as a shortcut for@RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
.Difference between
@GetMapping
&@RequestMapping
@GetMapping
supports theconsumes
attribute like@RequestMapping
.
@RequestMapping
is a class level
@GetMapping
is a method-level
With sprint Spring 4.3. and up things have changed. Now you can use @GetMapping on the method that will handle the http request. The class-level @RequestMapping specification is refined with the (method-level)@GetMapping annotation
Here is an example:
@Slf4j
@Controller
@RequestMapping("/orders")/* The @Request-Mapping annotation, when applied
at the class level, specifies the kind of requests
that this controller handles*/
public class OrderController {
@GetMapping("/current")/*@GetMapping paired with the classlevel
@RequestMapping, specifies that when an
HTTP GET request is received for /order,
orderForm() will be called to handle the request..*/
public String orderForm(Model model) {
model.addAttribute("order", new Order());
return "orderForm";
}
}
Prior to Spring 4.3, it was @RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.GET)
Short answer:
There is no difference in semantic.
Specifically, @GetMapping is a composed annotation that acts as a shortcut for @RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET).
Further reading:
RequestMapping
can be used at class level:
This annotation can be used both at the class and at the method level. In most cases, at the method level applications will prefer to use one of the HTTP method specific variants @GetMapping, @PostMapping, @PutMapping, @DeleteMapping, or @PatchMapping.
while GetMapping
only applies to method:
Annotation for mapping HTTP GET requests onto specific handler methods.
`@RequestMapping` since 2.5
=> Can handle all HTTP methods
=> Applicable to class and method
=> Can be used as a substitute of @Controller
and @RestController
, If we use it
along with @Component
.
`@GetMapping` since 4.3
=> Can handle only GET method of HTTP
=> Applicable to method only
@GetMapping
is a specific type of @RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
. Both supports consumes
@RequestMapping
supports consumes even with method=GET, while @GetMapping doesn't supports consumes.- @RequestMapping is Method & Type level annotation, while @GetMapping is a Method level annotation
Other than that @GetMapping is same as @RequestMapping(method=RequestMethod.GET)
@GetMapping is the shortcut for @RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET)
@RequestMapping is a class level
@GetMapping is a method-level
4)The @RequestMapping annotation is used to map web requests to specific handler classes and functions. This annotations key advantage is that it may be used on both the controller class and methods.
5)It is always advised to be specific while declaring @RequestMapping on the controller methods as in most mapping handler classes, @Getmapping is not used.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.
@GetMapping
supportsconsumes
- docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/javadoc-api/org/… – Anaesthesia