int brk(void *end_data_segment);
void *sbrk(intptr_t increment);
Calling sbrk() with an increment of 0 can be used to find the current location of the program break.
What is program break? Where does it start from,0x00?
int brk(void *end_data_segment);
void *sbrk(intptr_t increment);
Calling sbrk() with an increment of 0 can be used to find the current location of the program break.
What is program break? Where does it start from,0x00?
A program break is end of the process's data segment. AKA...
the program break is the first location after the end of the uninitialized data segment
As to where it starts from, it's system dependent but probably not 0x00.
data
segment is for initialized global and static variable. program break is the end of heap segment. –
Kinson Oversimplifying:
A process has several segments of memory:
(Of course, nowadays it's much more complex. There is a rodata segment, a uninitialized data segment, mappings allocated via mmap, a vdso, ...)
One traditional way a program can request more memory in a Unix-like OS is to increment the size of the data segment, and use a memory allocator (i.e. malloc()
implementation) to manage the resulting space. This is done via the brk()
system call, which changes the point where the data segment "breaks"/ends.
A program break is end of the process's data segment. AKA...
the program break is the first location after the end of the uninitialized data segment
As to where it starts from, it's system dependent but probably not 0x00.
data
segment is for initialized global and static variable. program break is the end of heap segment. –
Kinson These days, sbrk(2) (and brk
) are nearly obsolete system calls (and you can nearly forget about them and ignore the old notion of break; focus on understanding mmap(2)). Notice that the sbrk(2) man
page says in its NOTES :
Avoid using
brk()
andsbrk()
: the malloc(3) memory allocation package is the portable and comfortable way of allocating memory.
(emphasis mine)
Most implementations of malloc(3) (notably the one in musl-libc) are rather using mmap(2) to require memory - and increase their virtual address space - from the kernel (look at that virtual address space wikipage, it has a nice picture). Some malloc
-s use sbrk
for small allocations, mmap
for large ones.
Use strace(1) to find out the system calls (listed in syscalls(2)) done by some given process or command. BTW you'll then find that bash
and ls
(and probably many other programs) don't make a single call to sbrk
.
Explore the virtual address space of some process by using proc(5). Try cat /proc/$$/maps
and cat /proc/self/maps
and even cat /proc/$$/smaps
and read a bit to understand the output.
And sbrk
is not very thread friendly.
(my answer focuses on Linux)
Based on the following widely used diagram:
program break
, which is also known as brk
in many articles, points to the address of heap segment's end.
When you call malloc
, it changes the address of program break
.
You are saying that sbrk() is an obsolute system call and that we should use malloc(), but malloc(), according to her documentation, when allocating less memory than 128 KiB (32 pages) uses it. So we shouldn´t use sbrk() directly, but malloc() use it, if allocation is bigger than 128 KiB then malloc() uses mmap() that allocates private pages to the userspace. Finally its a good idea to understand sbrk(), at least for understanding the "Program Break" concept.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.