The modulo in Python is confusing.
In Python, %
operator is calculating the remainder:
>>> 9 % 5
4
However:
>>> -9 % 5
1
Why is the result 1
? and not -4
?
The modulo in Python is confusing.
In Python, %
operator is calculating the remainder:
>>> 9 % 5
4
However:
>>> -9 % 5
1
Why is the result 1
? and not -4
?
Because in python, the sign matches the denominator.
>>> 9 % -5
-1
>>> -9 % 5
1
For an explanation of why it was implemented this way, read the blog post by Guido.
-4+5 = 1
, match the sign –
Hawks -10 % 5 is 0, ie, -10 is evenly divided by 5.
You ask why -9 % 5 is not -4, and the answer is that both 1 and -4 can be correct answers, it depends on what -9 divided by 5 is. Of course -9 divided by 5 is 1.8, but this is integer division, in Python 3 represented by //, so I'll use // here to be clear that it's integer division we are talking about.
I'll explain this by not using negative numbers, it's easier.
9 // 5 is 1. Ie, you can subtract 5 from 9 only 1 time, and the rest is 4. But if you subtract 5 from 9 one more time, well, then the rest becomes -1!
So -1 is a correct answer to 9 % 5, if 9 // 5 is 2.
In Python 9 // 5 is 1, because the Python integer division is a floor division, ie it always rounds down. If it has rounded up 9 // 5 would be two, and 9 % 5 would have been -1.
Now lets look at the case when we use negative numbers: -9 divided by 5 is now -2. Because it is floor division, it always rounds down. That means that the rest is 1. So -9 % 5 is 1, not -4.
This really has to do with how python rounds integer division.
Mathematically, the following has to be true always for any int x and y
x == (x // y) * y + x % y
So from this, we can say
x % y == x - (x // y) * y
Now recall that python rounds integer divison toward negative infinity, not toward zero. For example -9 // 5 gives -2, not -1. With this logic, you obtain -9 % 5 = 1
Think about it like this:
0 % 5 is 0
1 % 5 is 1
So... what if you go backwards?
-1 % 5 must be 4
-2 % 5 must be 3
and so on.
You'll see that following this -9 % 5 is 1
NOTE: Depending on the programming language and the implementation of %, you might get different results since programmers disagree on how to handle negative numbers in %
In integers, you can't always pick such a quotient that quotient * divisor == dividend
. If the product
does not equal the dividend
, one always has to make a choice, whether to make it slightly less than the dividend
, or slightly greater than the dividend
. The sum of the product
with the remainder
makes the dividend
, that's what the remainder
is. In any case, the dividends and products have to be close, meaning the absolute value of the remainder has to be less than that of the divisor.
When the divisor
is positive, the products
increase as the quotients
increase; when the divisor
is negative, the products
decrease as the quotients
increase. In the first case, the products go from the below, in the second case, the products go from the above. In Python, in both cases the next quotient
is only taken when the dividend
reaches the next possible product
, going the same way the products go. Before that, only the remainder
changes to accommodate for the next dividend
, again always going in the same direction as the dividends change, without a break at zero. This rule is universal in Python, it holds always.
That is not the reason why this choice had been made, but that gives the idea what happens (i. e. why the results are what they are, and which results to expect).
I'll write the calculation as a math procedure with your example.
For -9 % 5:
=> -9 = -2 x 5 + remainder
=> -9 = -10 + remainder
=> remainder = 1
So, -9 % 5 = 1 in Python.
© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.