EnableBinding, Output, Input deprecated Since version of 3.1 of Spring Cloud Stream

I'm assuming you are already familiar with the main concepts, and will focus on the migration.
I'm using kotlin for the demo code, to reduce verbosity

First, some references which may help:

Here is the initial relevant doc: link
This is an explanation for the naming scheme in the new functional format: link
This is a more detailed explanation with some more advanced scenarios: link

TL;DR

Instead of working with annotation-based configuration, spring now uses detected beans of Consumer/Function/Supplier to define your streams for you.

Input/Consumer

Whereas before you had code looking like this:

interface BindableGradesChannel {
    @Input
    fun gradesChannel(): SubscribableChannel

    companion object {
        const val INPUT = "gradesChannel"
    }
}

and the usage was similar to:

@Service
@EnableBinding(BindableGradesChannel::class)
class GradesListener {
    private val log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(GradesListener::class.java)
    
    @StreamListener(BindableScoresChannel.INPUT)
    fun listen(grade: Grade) {
        log.info("Received $grade")
        // do something
    }
}

now the entire definition is irrelevant, and can be done like so:

@Service
class GradesListener {
    private val log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(GradesListener::class.java)

    @Bean
    fun gradesChannel(): Consumer<Grade> {
        return Consumer { listen(grade = it) }
    }
    
    fun listen(grade: Grade) {
        log.info("Received $grade")
        // do something
    }
}

notice how the Consumer bean replaced the @StreamListener and the @Input.

Regarding the configuration, if before in order to configure you had an application.yml looking like so:

spring:
  cloud:
    stream:
      bindings:
        gradesChannel:
          destination: GradesExchange
          group: grades-updates
          consumer:
            concurrency: 10
            max-attempts: 3

now it should be like so:

spring:
  cloud:
    stream:
      bindings:
        gradesChannel-in-0:
          destination: GradesExchange
          group: grades-updates
          consumer:
            concurrency: 10
            max-attempts: 3

notice how gradesChannel was replaced by gradesChannel-in-0 - to understand the full naming convention please see the naming convention link at the top.

Some details:

If you have more than one such bean in your application, you need to define the spring.cloud.function.definition property.
You have the option to give your channels custom names, so if you'd like to continue using gradesChannel you can set spring.cloud.stream.function.bindings.gradesChannel-in-0=gradesChannel and use everywhere in the configuration gradesChannel.

Output/Supplier

The concept here is similar, you replace config and code looking like this:

interface BindableStudentsChannel {
    @Output
    fun studentsChannel(): MessageChannel
}

and

@Service
@EnableBinding(BindableStudentsChannel::class)
class StudentsQueueWriter(private val studentsChannel: BindableStudentsChannel) {
    fun publish(message: Message<Student>) {
        studentsChannel.studentsChannel().send(message)
    }
}

can now be replaced by:

@Service
class StudentsQueueWriter {
    @Bean
    fun studentsChannel(): Supplier<Student> {
        return Supplier { Student("Adam") }
    }
}

As you can see, we have a major difference - when is it called and by who?

Before we could trigger it manually, but now it is triggered by spring, every second (by default). This is fine for use cases such as when you need to publish a sensor data every second, but this is not good when you want to send the message on an event. Besides using Function for whatever reason, spring offers 2 alternatives:

StreamBridge - link

Using StreamBridge you can. define the target explicitly like so:

@Service
class StudentsQueueWriter(private val streamBridge: StreamBridge) {
    fun publish(message: Message<Student>) {
        streamBridge.send("studentsChannel-out-0", message)
    }
}

This way you don't define the target channel as a bean, but you can still send the message. The downside is that you have some explicit configuration in your class.

Reactor API - link

The other way is to use some kind of reactive mechanism such as Sinks.Many, and to return it. Using this your code will look similar to:

@Service
class StudentsQueueWriter {
    val students: Sinks.Many<String> = Sinks.many().multicast().onBackpressureBuffer()
    @Bean
    fun studentsChannel(): Supplier<Flux<Student>> {
        return Supplier { students.asFlux() }
    }
}

and the usage may be similar to:

class MyClass(val studentsQueueWriter: StudentsQueueWriter) {
    fun newStudent() {
        studentsQueueWriter.students.tryEmitNext(Student("Adam"))
    }
}

Recommended topics

Hot tags