We're seeing an odd issue with some of our code when things go awry - in certain circumstances, the exception message and the stack trace don't match up.
We have a number of message handlers with similar structure, like the following:
public void Handle(AddTelephoneNumber message)
{
var directory = ClientService.Directory(Context).Result;
var client = ClientService.ClientLookup(message.ClientNumber, Context).Result;
if (!client.Item1)
{
//Client does not exist
throw new Exception("Unable to locate client"); //A
}
//B Start
var clientPersonsLnk = client.Item2.Links.Single(l => l.Rel == "client-persons");
var persons = ClientService.Get<Persons>(clientPersonsLnk.Uri, Context).Result;
var person = ClientService.Get<Person>(persons.PartyUri(message.Party), Context).Result;
var phones = ClientService.Get<TelephoneNumbers>(person.Links.Single(l => l.Rel == "person-telephones").Uri, Context).Result;
var addPhoneLink = phones.Links.Single(l => l.Rel == "telephone-add");
var newPhone = new TelephoneNumber();
//Set up the new telephone number, elided from sample
//B End
var result = ClientService.Post(addPhoneLink.Uri, newPhone, Context).Result;
if (result.Item1 == HttpStatusCode.OK || result.Item1 == HttpStatusCode.Created)
return;
else
_logger.WarnFormat("ClientService.Post to {0} returned unexpected response code of: {1}", addPhoneLink.Uri, result.Item1);
//C
throw new Exception("Unable to process telephone number addition message");
}
The behaviour we observe is as follows - if one of A or C occurs, we inevitably get the message eventually delivered to the error queue, with the following information in the message extension:
<HeaderInfo>
<Key>NServiceBus.ExceptionInfo.Message</Key>
<Value>Unable to process change person name message</Value>
</HeaderInfo>
<HeaderInfo>
<Key>NServiceBus.ExceptionInfo.Source</Key>
<Value>ProjectName</Value>
</HeaderInfo>
<HeaderInfo>
<Key>NServiceBus.ExceptionInfo.StackTrace</Key>
<Value>System.Exception: Unable to process change person name message
at ProjectName.Handlers.ChangePersonNameHandler.Handle(ChangePersonName message) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\6601b33332f54f3c\ProjectName\Handlers\ChangePersonNameHandler.cs:line 45
at NServiceBus.Unicast.HandlerInvocationCache.Invoke(Object handler, Object message, Dictionary`2 dictionary) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\d4de8921a0aabf04\src\NServiceBus.Core\Unicast\HandlerInvocationCache.cs:line 63
at NServiceBus.Unicast.UnicastBus.<>c__DisplayClass2f.<DispatchMessageToHandlersBasedOnType>b__2a(Action dispatch) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\d4de8921a0aabf04\src\NServiceBus.Core\Unicast\UnicastBus.cs:line 1093</Value>
</HeaderInfo>
(Apologies for switching to a different message type - I just wanted to find an example)
What seems to be consist, though, is that if the exception message matches the one given at point A, then the stack trace, and specifically this line:
at ProjectName.Handlers.ChangePersonNameHandler.Handle(ChangePersonName message) in c:\TeamCity\buildAgent\work\6601b33332f54f3c\ProjectName\Handlers\ChangePersonNameHandler.cs:line 45
Will invariably contain the line number for the exception at point C. And vice versa, if we get the exception message that should be produced at line C, then the stack trace's line number will finger the line A.
Any exception thrown by the methods inside section B seem to be faithfully reporting the correct line numbers. So it seems like exceptions directly thrown in the handler have this bizarre behaviour, but any exceptions throw by code we call into (e.g. from Linq if a sequence doesn't contain any elements) behaves as usual.
Aside from gibbering in disbelief, does anyone know of anything that can cause such a switch around to occur?
From packages.config:
<package id="NServiceBus" version="4.0.1" targetFramework="net45" />
<package id="NServiceBus.CastleWindsor" version="4.0.1" targetFramework="net45" />
<package id="NServiceBus.Host" version="4.0.1" targetFramework="net45" />
<package id="NServiceBus.Interfaces" version="4.0.1" targetFramework="net45" />
<package id="NServiceBus.NHibernate" version="4.0.1" targetFramework="net45" />
Or is there any further investigating I should do, more info to add to the question, etc?
TypeAException
andTypeCException
, then I'd guess the linenumber is wrong but the exception type is correct? – Galven