Every tutorial/explanation I see out there that discusses HTML5 video format fallbacks use this type of markup as an example:
<video autoplay>
<source src="/myvideo.mp4" type="video/mp4">
<source src="/myvideo.webm" type="video/webm">
Sorry, your browser doesn't support HTML5 video.
</video>
So my question, why does everyone suggest to put the MP4 before the Webm format? If your browser supports Webm, it almost definitely supports MP4... The above markup essentially ensures that the more efficient Webm video will never be used, even though it has arguably better compression and will reduce bandwidth. Why is this?
Am I missing something about the way video fallbacks work?