Mercurial: how to amend the last commit?
Asked Answered
U

8

225

I'm looking for a counter-part of git commit --amend in Mercurial, i.e. a way to modify the commit which my working copy is linked to. I'm only interested in the last commit, not an arbitrary earlier commit.

The requirements for this amend-procedure are:

  • if possible, it should not require any extensions. It must not require non-default extensions, i.e. extensions which do not come with an official Mercurial installation.

  • if the commit to amend is one head of my current branch, no new head should be created. If the commit is not head, a new head may be created.

  • the procedure should be safe in a way that if for whatever reasons the amending fails, I want to have the same working copy and repository state restored as before the amending. With other words, if the amending itself can fail, there should be a fail-safe procedure to restore the working copy and repository state. I'm referring to "failures" which lie in the nature of the amend-procedure (like e.g. conflicts), not to file-system-related problems (like access restrictions, not being able to lock a file for writing, ...)

Update (1):

  • the procedure must be automatable, so it can be performed by a GUI client without any user interaction required.

Update (2):

  • files in the working directory must not be touched (there may be file system locks on certain modified files). This especially means, that a possible approach may at no point require a clean working directory.
Upthrust answered 18/11, 2011 at 13:4 Comment(1)
"By a GUI client"?? Surely, you mean a CLI client?Disappointment
C
303

You can now use the --amend option with hg commit to update the last commit with the current working directory, since the release of Mercurial 2.2.

From the command line reference:

The --amend flag can be used to amend the parent of the working directory with a new commit that contains the changes in the parent in addition to those currently reported by hg status, if there are any. The old commit is stored in a backup bundle in .hg/strip-backup (see hg help bundle and hg help unbundle on how to restore it).

Message, user and date are taken from the amended commit unless specified. When a message isn't specified on the command line, the editor will open with the message of the amended commit.

The great thing is that this mechanism is "safe", because it relies on the "Phases" feature to prevent updates that would change history that's already been made available outside of the local repository.

Contemporaneous answered 2/5, 2012 at 18:46 Comment(2)
Good answer! The experimental evolve extension allows you to safely amend non-head commits. The old commit will be marked obsolete and hidden. With a non-publishing server, you can even do this safely after you've pushed the changesets.Kidderminster
To just update the message on the last commit: hg commit --amend -m "this is my new message"Tailback
S
57

You have 3 options to edit commits in Mercurial:

  1. hg strip --keep --rev -1 undo the last (1) commit(s), so you can do it again (see this answer for more information).

  2. Using the MQ extension, which is shipped with Mercurial

  3. Even if it isn't shipped with Mercurial, the Histedit extension is worth mentioning

You can also have a look on the Editing History page of the Mercurial wiki.

In short, editing history is really hard and discouraged. And if you've already pushed your changes, there's barely nothing you can do, except if you have total control of all the other clones.

I'm not really familiar with the git commit --amend command, but AFAIK, Histedit is what seems to be the closest approach, but sadly it isn't shipped with Mercurial. MQ is really complicated to use, but you can do nearly anything with it.

Scissel answered 18/11, 2011 at 13:34 Comment(8)
I'm not sure why I missed rollback, but it seems to do (almost) what I want. The only problem is, when a file has been removed for my original commit and it has been resurrected for my amended commit: before the rollback it will be unversioned, after the rollback, it will be scheduled for removal (but the file still exists in the working directory)Upthrust
@Marc I'm not sure I understand your problem, but have a look on the forget command, I think it's what you looking for.Scissel
I don't think "forget" will be helpful here. Here's the problem in more detail: (1) I'm at revision 2 (2) Remove "file" and have some other changes (3) Commit changes, resulting in revision 3 (4) Now I'll change my mind and decide "file" should not be removed from the commit, so I want to amend revision 3. Hence, I'll re-add "file" which is now unversioned (5) Now I perform rollback: it will reset the dirstate and mark "file" as removed. (6) When performing "hg commit" again now, "file" will remain as removed, though it shouldn't be anymore. How could an automated fix for that look like?Upthrust
For the automated part I don't know, but you can do hg revert myfile to undo the deletion. Maybe re-adding with hg add the file after the rollback also works.Scissel
Unfortunately, both "hg rollback" and MQ extension won't work for following scenario: - revision 2 has been committed with changes to file1 and file2. - working copy contains changes for file2 and file3. - only the changes for file3, but not for file2 should be committed. "hg rollback" obviously isn't able to do that. Whatever I tried with patch queues, local modifications need to be stashed away, i.e. my working directory needs to be touched. "git commit --amend" can cope with that scenario.Upthrust
@Marc Like I said, history editing is discouraged with Mercurial. It's one of the main difference with Git. You can do what you want by stashing away your changes (have a look at the Shelve extension) or saving the diff to a patch file that you can reapply with the patch command before using MQ, but what you want to do is not in the Mercurial philosophy : The history is sacred !Scissel
I agree that editing history of published changes should be avoided, but editing of my local history is one of the highlights of a DVCS. MQ with its qimport is pure history-editing, AFAICT.Upthrust
strip is an extensionKoball
H
42

GUI equivalent for hg commit --amend:

This also works from TortoiseHG's GUI (I'm using v2.5):

Swich to the 'Commit' view or, in the workbench view, select the 'working directory' entry. The 'Commit' button has an option named 'Amend current revision' (click the button's drop-down arrow to find it).

enter image description here

          ||
          ||
          \/

enter image description here

Caveat emptor:

This extra option will only be enabled if the mercurial version is at least 2.2.0, and if the current revision is not public, is not a patch and has no children. [...]

Clicking the button will call 'commit --amend' to 'amend' the revision.

More info about this on the THG dev channel

Hypoxanthine answered 4/1, 2013 at 11:4 Comment(1)
Very helpful, thanks. THG is smart enough to default the commit (amend) message to the message from the prior commit - just what I wanted.Medardas
S
8

I'm tuning into what krtek has written. More specifically solution 1:

Assumptions:

  • you've committed one (!) changeset but have not pushed it yet
  • you want to modify this changeset (e.g. add, remove or change files and/or the commit message)

Solution:

  • use hg rollback to undo the last commit
  • commit again with the new changes in place

The rollback really undoes the last operation. Its way of working is quite simple: normal operations in HG will only append to files; this includes a commit. Mercurial keeps track of the file lengths of the last transaction and can therefore completely undo one step by truncating the files back to their old lengths.

Slideaction answered 18/11, 2011 at 13:47 Comment(2)
Thanks for tuning solution (1); there is just a small problem left with rollback, please see my comment at krtek's solution.Upthrust
One thing to emphasise on rollback, because it catches people out, is that it's the last transaction on the repo that gets rolled back, not the last commit. So if something else has caused a write to the repo, rollback won't help. It's a subtle but important thing to remember. MQ and histedit can help once the rollback window has been closed, but still only up to a certain point.Adiell
V
7

Assuming that you have not yet propagated your changes, here is what you can do.

  • Add to your .hgrc:

    [extensions]
    mq =
    
  • In your repository:

    hg qimport -r0:tip
    hg qpop -a
    

    Of course you need not start with revision zero or pop all patches, for the last just one pop (hg qpop) suffices (see below).

  • remove the last entry in the .hg/patches/series file, or the patches you do not like. Reordering is possible too.

  • hg qpush -a; hg qfinish -a
  • remove the .diff files (unapplied patches) still in .hg/patches (should be one in your case).

If you don't want to take back all of your patch, you can edit it by using hg qimport -r0:tip (or similar), then edit stuff and use hg qrefresh to merge the changes into the topmost patch on your stack. Read hg help qrefresh.

By editing .hg/patches/series, you can even remove several patches, or reorder some. If your last revision is 99, you may just use hg qimport -r98:tip; hg qpop; [edit series file]; hg qpush -a; hg qfinish -a.

Of course, this procedure is highly discouraged and risky. Make a backup of everything before you do this!

As a sidenote, I've done it zillions of times on private-only repositories.

Venter answered 18/11, 2011 at 14:4 Comment(4)
I had also considered using mq-extension, however it requires quite many operations for which some of them may fail (e.g. if binary files are involved). Furthermore, having to edit .hg/patch/series won't be acceptable, as this procedure should be used within a GUI client (I've updated requirements above)Upthrust
Hmmm, sorry that this won't for you, on a private repository this really kicks ass (with backups -- I've already fatfinger-destroyed a rep with it ^^). It's quite cool to combine patches into one before pushing the local changes using hg qfold, btwVenter
+1 for using MQ, but I think you've gone overboard. He's only asking about amending the last commit. Also that import will keel over as soon as it hits a merge. 'qimport -r tip; <edit stuff>; qrefresh -e; qfin -a' will do the job (-e to edit the commit message)Adiell
true, merges are a problem, I usually only pop one patch and use hg import -r<prev>:tip. A pitty there is no shortcut for the previous version, like in subversion.Venter
L
3

Recent versions of Mercurial include the evolve extension which provides the hg amend command. This allows amending a commit without losing the pre-amend history in your version control.

hg amend [OPTION]... [FILE]...

aliases: refresh

combine a changeset with updates and replace it with a new one

Commits a new changeset incorporating both the changes to the given files
and all the changes from the current parent changeset into the repository.

See 'hg commit' for details about committing changes.

If you don't specify -m, the parent's message will be reused.

Behind the scenes, Mercurial first commits the update as a regular child
of the current parent. Then it creates a new commit on the parent's
parents with the updated contents. Then it changes the working copy parent
to this new combined changeset. Finally, the old changeset and its update
are hidden from 'hg log' (unless you use --hidden with log).

See https://www.mercurial-scm.org/doc/evolution/user-guide.html#example-3-amend-a-changeset-with-evolve for a complete description of the evolve extension.

Loxodromics answered 6/3, 2018 at 12:12 Comment(1)
Re-using the same commit message is a nice feature!Yuu
C
2

Might not solve all the problems in the original question, but since this seems to be the de facto post on how mercurial can amend to previous commit, I'll add my 2 cents worth of information.

If you are like me, and only wish to modify the previous commit message (fix a typo etc) without adding any files, this will work

hg commit -X 'glob:**' --amend

Without any include or exclude patterns hg commit will by default include all files in working directory. Applying pattern -X 'glob:**' will exclude all possible files, allowing only to modify the commit message.

Functionally it is same as git commit --amend when there are no files in index/stage.

Costin answered 3/7, 2019 at 18:2 Comment(0)
D
-1

Another solution could be use the uncommit command to exclude specific file from current commit.

hg uncommit [file/directory]

This is very helpful when you want to keep current commit and deselect some files from commit (especially helpful for files/directories have been deleted).

Deloisedelong answered 7/1, 2020 at 13:16 Comment(1)
uncommit is an experimental extensionKoball

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.