When to use Amazon Cloudfront or S3

Question

Are there use cases that lend themselves better to Amazon cloudfront over s3 or the other way around? I'm trying to understand the difference between the 2 through examples.

Damaging

If you're serving files, only CloudFront lets you have HTTPS on a custom domain. That sealed it for us. – Proselyte

Answer 1

Amazon S3 is designed for large-capacity, low-cost file storage in one specific geographical region.* The storage and bandwidth costs are quite low.

Amazon CloudFront is a Content Delivery Network (CDN) which proxies and caches web data at edge locations as close to users as possible.

When end users request an object using this domain name, they are automatically routed to the nearest edge location for high performance delivery of your content. (Amazon)

The data served by CloudFront may or may not come from S3. Since it is more optimized for delivery speed, the bandwidth costs a little more.

If your user base is localized, you won't see too much difference working with S3 or CloudFront (but you have to choose the right location for your S3 bucket: US, EU, APAC). If your user base is spread globally and speed is important, CloudFront may be a better option.

Both S3 and CloudFront allow domain aliases, however CloudFront allows multiple aliases so that d1.mystatics.com, d2.mystatics.com and d3.mystatics.com could all point to the same location increasing the capacity for parallel downloads (this used to be recommended by Google but with the introduction of SPDY and HTTP/2 is of lesser importance).

CloudFront also supports CORS as of 2014 (thanks sergiopantoja).

* Note: S3 can now automatically replicate to additional regions as of 2015.

Anselma

There is a difference for web fonts due to CloudFront not fully supporting CORS. It caches the headers in the S3 response but for full CORS support, some headers should vary depending on the requesting server (origin). Work around: forums.aws.amazon.com/message.jspa?messageID=422504#422532 – Leannleanna

To keep this updated, CloudFront supports CORS now: aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2014/06/26/… – Makkah

Be aware that Cloudfront evicts content very quickly. Setting max-age to more than a day does not mean you content will not be evicted if it hasn't been touched for 61 minutes. Not much use for user specific content as that amounts to infrequent access. – Quackenbush

S3 also allows for cross-region replication, so couldn't you just use that? Or is the IDEA that the CDNs in different zone shave different cache content (ie. maybe most popular videos in UK are different than India) and that's better than having complete replication in S3? – Weigela

@Makkah Nine years later, S3 supports CORS, too, right? – Greenleaf

Answer 2

CloudFront and S3 Bucket is not the same. In layman's terms: CloudFront enables you to accelerate content delivery of your web contents via Content Delivery Network (CDN) in edge locations, whereas S3 Buckets are where you store your actual files. CloudFront sources may not necessarily be from S3 but for easier visualization of S3 integration with CloudFront:

Quatrefoil

thanks! this diagram demonstrates the difference clearly. – Haight

See CloudFront as dynamic outposts of their fetch origin. – Vorticella

Answer 3

Amazon CLOUDFRONT and S3 are two different services provided by Amazon Web Services.

Amazon S3 is a storage service in which we can store static files like:

css, images, javascripts,videos, etc...

Amazon CloudFront is a middle-ware which stands in between a user requesting for a file from AWS and the S3 data center in a specific region, CloudFront is used to speeds up distribution of your static and dynamic web content from S3 to the User.

You can understand it better by an example:-

For example, your S3 is located in AWS region US East (N. Virginia) which a data center location to store your files.

If a user from India tries to access a file from a AWS server in Virginia, then user would need to go to that specific location with a request, and this will take a lot of time.

What CloudFront does is that it stands as a middleware between user and AWS S3.

---

The most often used files can be cached on CloudFront and what it does is, it replicates those files on edge locations (To deliver content to end users with lower latency, Amazon CloudFront uses a global network of edge locations for content delivery).

If the content is already in the edge location with the lowest latency, CloudFront delivers it immediately. If the content is not currently in that edge location, CloudFront retrieves it from an Amazon S3 bucket and provides it to user as faster as it can.

Every request is given a new DNS from CloudFront to the S3, so this would result in lower traffic as well as more parallel request processing.

Following is the list of current edge locations as per July-2016:-

United States

• Ashburn, VA (3)
• Atlanta, GA
• Chicago, IL
• Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (2)
• Hayward, CA
• Jacksonville, FL
• Los Angeles, CA (2)
• Miami, FL
• New York, NY (3)
• Newark, NJ
• Palo Alto, CA
• San Jose, CA
• Seattle, WA
• South Bend, IN
• St. Louis, MO

Europe

• Amsterdam, Netherlands (2)

• Dublin, Ireland

• Frankfurt, Germany (3)

• London, England (3)

• Madrid, Spain

• Marseille, France

• Milan, Italy

• Paris, France (2)

• Stockholm, Sweden

• Warsaw, Poland

Asia

• Chennai, India

• Hong Kong (2)

• Mumbai, India

• Manila, the Philippines

• New Delhi, India

• Osaka, Japan

• Seoul, Korea (3)

• Singapore (2)

• Taipei, Taiwan

• Tokyo, Japan (2)

Australia

• Melbourne, Australia

• Sydney, Australia

South America

• São Paulo, Brazil

• Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

From this you can conclude that if the users are limited are from the same region as your S3 is hosted on, then you do not require to go for CloudFront, and if the number of users is increased on global level then you should definitely use CloudFront for better latency and traffic control.

Cosmic

this is the best answer – Lenardlenci

Answer 4

Another major difference is that CloudFront allows you to mirror the site on your server. Cloudfront then caches the files such as images, mp3 or video using its content delivery network.

This saves you having to duplicate your assets as you would when you use Amazon S3.

However, after a file expires, CloudFront will fetch it again from your live site (at cost). So cloud front is best for frequently accessed files, and less so for infrequently accessed ones.

One way to set the file expiry for apache is in .htaccess. For example

<filesMatch "\\.(mp3|mp4)$">
Header set Cache-Control "max-age=648000, private"
</filesMatch>

Grozny

Answer 5

Another case for using CloudFront over S3 is that you can use an SSL certificate to a custom domain in CloudFront whereas you cannot in S3. A pretty good reason imho!

Slut

And with the new Certificate Manager it is even easy! – Thunder

Answer 6

Amazon S3 is a Simple Storage Service, this can be used large amount of information i.e. Videos, Images, PDF etc.

CloudFront is a Content Delivery Network, which is closer to the end user and is used to make the information available on Amazon S3 in the least possible time.

A sample use case is Video on Demand.

1. You stores your videos at one place. S3 stores all the pre-recorded videos in different formats.
2. You have global user case
3. CloudFront is used to cache the video to edge locations. This can be used to deliver content to the end user. Location is picked up automatically based on the closest physical edge location. Currently there are around 51 edge locations.

Some advantages of using CloudFront for right use case:

1. Improved Latency - Better end user experience.
2. Possible reduced data transfer cost. As the data is not every-time transferred from same S3 bucket in a particular AWS region.

Other possible use cases:

1. Live streaming
2. Gaming
3. Website Acceleration

Annelieseannelise

Let's say s3 stored 1 billion images. How many would be cached in cloudfront, how is this cache managed, and is the cache different for different users? – Weigela

Answer 7

One aspect missed here is:

Amazon Cloudfront also offers lower prices than Amazon S3 at higher usage tiers.

• Cloudfront CDN is for distribution of content across multiple servers geographically distributed (CSS, JS)

• Whereas s3 is more of a per user less used resources store (user images, PDFs).

You can serve your Cloudfront resources from an s3 bucket completely bypassing your web server.

(Useful in situations where your web server pre-compiles and stores images and java-script. storing them on s3 means your server memory footprint is reduced )

Ex: On Heroku Slugs (complied application sizes can be reduced by using s3 and wrapping it with cloud-front CDN will improve throughput)

Zarla

Answer 8

As first i would like to explain that Amazon S3 is the cloud Storage and Cloud Front is the content delivery network (CDN).

So you can use to store the files on S3 and can create the distribution to serve the content over the internet. As well as you can create distribution for the specific regions.

Berylberyle

Answer 9

Amazon S3 is a great object storage platform if you are looking for a globally distributed storage system to protect against regions/zones going down. It is also great for static/fixed content that is not transactional and changing such as pictures, videos, images, backups, etc. Hope that helps!

Forman