Kotlin and new ActivityTestRule : The @Rule must be public

Asked 29/4, 2015 at 13:22 Answered 12/9, 2023 at 15:31

Solved android testing android-espresso kotlin

320

I'm trying to make UI test for my android app in Kotlin. Since the new system using ActivityTestRule, I can't make it work: it compiles correctly, and at runtime, I get:

java.lang.Exception: The @Rule 'mActivityRule' must be public.
    at org.junit.internal.runners.rules.RuleFieldValidator.addError(RuleFieldValidator.java:90)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.rules.RuleFieldValidator.validatePublic(RuleFieldValidator.java:67)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.rules.RuleFieldValidator.validateField(RuleFieldValidator.java:55)
    at org.junit.internal.runners.rules.RuleFieldValidator.validate(RuleFieldValidator.java:50)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.validateFields(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:170)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.collectInitializationErrors(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.validate(ParentRunner.java:344)
    at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.<init>(ParentRunner.java:74)
    at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.<init>(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:55)
    at android.support.test.internal.runner.junit4.AndroidJUnit4ClassRunner.<init>(AndroidJUnit4ClassRunner.java:38)
    at android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnit4.<init>(AndroidJUnit4.java:36)
    at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.constructNative(Native Method)
    at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:417)
    at android.support.test.internal.runner.junit4.AndroidAnnotatedBuilder.buildAndroidRunner(AndroidAnnotatedBuilder.java:57)
    at android.support.test.internal.runner.junit4.AndroidAnnotatedBuilder.runnerForClass(AndroidAnnotatedBuilder.java:45)
    at org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.safeRunnerForClass(RunnerBuilder.java:57)
    at org.junit.internal.builders.AllDefaultPossibilitiesBuilder.runnerForClass(AllDefaultPossibilitiesBuilder.java:29)
    at org.junit.runner.Computer.getRunner(Computer.java:38)
    at org.junit.runner.Computer$1.runnerForClass(Computer.java:29)
    at org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.safeRunnerForClass(RunnerBuilder.java:57)
    at org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.runners(RunnerBuilder.java:98)
    at org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder.runners(RunnerBuilder.java:84)
    at org.junit.runners.Suite.<init>(Suite.java:79)
    at org.junit.runner.Computer.getSuite(Computer.java:26)
    at android.support.test.internal.runner.TestRequestBuilder.classes(TestRequestBuilder.java:691)
    at android.support.test.internal.runner.TestRequestBuilder.build(TestRequestBuilder.java:654)
    at android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner.buildRequest(AndroidJUnitRunner.java:329)
    at android.support.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner.onStart(AndroidJUnitRunner.java:226)
    at android.app.Instrumentation$InstrumentationThread.run(Instrumentation.java:1584)

Here is how I declared mActivityRule:

RunWith(javaClass<AndroidJUnit4>())
LargeTest
public class RadisTest {

    Rule
    public val mActivityRule: ActivityTestRule<MainActivity> = ActivityTestRule(javaClass<MainActivity>())

   ...
}

It is already public :/

Austreng answered 29/4, 2015 at 13:22 Comment(3)

Currently, Kotlin does not support making fields that are backing properties public, but we are working on it – Remise 29/4, 2015 at 14:20

Is there a bug tracking this? – Austreng 29/4, 2015 at 14:29

youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-3441 – Remise 1/5, 2015 at 15:13

397

JUnit allows providing rules through a test class field or a getter method.

What you annotated is in Kotlin a property though, which JUnit won't recognize.

Here are the possible ways to specify a JUnit rule in Kotlin:

Through an annotated getter method

From M13, the annotation processor supports annotation targets. When you write

@Rule
public val mActivityRule: ActivityTestRule<MainActivity> = ActivityTestRule(javaClass<MainActivity>())

though, the annotation will use the property target by default (not visible to Java).

You can annotate the property getter however, which is also public and thus satisfies JUnit requirements for a rule getter:

@get:Rule
public val mActivityRule: ActivityTestRule<MainActivity> = ActivityTestRule(javaClass<MainActivity>())

Alternatively, you can define the rule with a function instead of a property (achieving manually the same result as with @get:Rule).

Through an annotated public field

Kotlin also allows since the beta candidate to deterministically compile properties to fields on the JVM, in which case the annotations and modifiers apply to the generated field. This is done using Kotlin's @JvmField property annotation as answered by @jkschneider.

Side note: be sure to prefix the Rule annotation with an @ character as it is now the only supported syntax for annotations, and avoid @publicField as it will soon be dropped.

Noddy answered 28/9, 2015 at 16:22 Comment(5)

Does it? I still get the error and it is public with M14 (0.14.449) – Austreng 10/10, 2015 at 14:48

seems to need @publicField, but it is deprecated, so I tried lateinit as suggested by IDE, but then it barks at me saying lateinit can be applied only on mutable (the blog's article says otherwise…) – Austreng 10/10, 2015 at 14:54

Updated my answer ;) As for lateinit val, it has been removed in M14 since it didn't fully enforce the immutability of the field, see the [M14 release blog post](blog.jetbrains.com/kotlin/2015/10/kotlin-m14-is-out/). – Noddy 10/10, 2015 at 15:29

What is @get: annotation? It also does not work in my situation. – Rhinehart 20/9, 2018 at 6:23

After changing Rule to @get: Rule, it was fixed. Thanks – Subdiaconate 21/3, 2022 at 10:49

271

With Kotlin 1.0.0+, this works:

@Rule @JvmField 
val mActivityRule = ActivityTestRule(MainActivity::class.java)

Thereunder answered 28/9, 2015 at 5:5 Comment(3)

And it solved the problem of the lint tool complaining that the public was qualifier on the rule was redundant. – Bendy 27/3, 2016 at 23:31

Yes \@JvmField is crucial or use rather \@get:Rule – Votary 14/1, 2019 at 10:58

Only works on final fields. Won't work for a rule like var wireMockRule = WireMockRule(wireMockConfig().dynamicPort()). – Maciemaciel 14/3, 2019 at 6:33

Use this:

@get:Rule
var mActivityRule: ActivityTestRule<MainActivity> = ActivityTestRule(MainActivity::class.java)

Homoio answered 21/6, 2018 at 2:26 Comment(1)

Care to add an explanation? – Benford 19/4, 2019 at 20:45

Instead of @Rule , you should use @get:Rule.

Firecracker answered 7/4, 2020 at 9:20 Comment(0)

With Kotlin 1.0.4:

val mActivityRule: ...
    @Rule get

Thunder answered 9/10, 2016 at 9:4 Comment(3)

This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review – Verify 10/10, 2016 at 5:38

@JigneshAnsodariya - I did a check and this answer provides an answer to what has been asked. More information on how this is working can be found at the following link - kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/… – Hindquarter 4/11, 2016 at 17:46

There is a problem with this approach. If you want to access the activity under test (for example: assertTrue(activityRule.activity.isFinishing)), the property getter will be called, thus creating a new rule. In this case activityRule.activity will be null. – Peavey 30/10, 2017 at 8:20

I agree with @marci, take this example to clarify the concept:

@get:Rule val tempFolder = TemporaryFolder() //apply @Rule annotation to property getter

Contrabassoon answered 12/9, 2023 at 15:31 Comment(0)

Through an annotated getter method

Through an annotated public field

Recommended topics

Hot tags