Spring MVC Framework: MultipartResolver with PUT method

Question

I'm developing a spring mvc app with framework 3.2.3.RELEASE

In my app I handle Multipart with StandardServletMultipartResolver, but with apache commons-fileupload 1.3 the things are the same.

I would like to know why the implementation of isMultipart method take in account only POST method, and not PUT method. If I want to update an entity and the related file I must do it with a POST.

Looking at org.springframework.web.multipart.support.Standard ServletMultipartResolver:

public boolean isMultipart(HttpServletRequest request) {
    // Same check as in Commons FileUpload...
    if (!"post".equals(request.getMethod().toLowerCase()) ) {
        return false;
    }
    String contentType = request.getContentType();
    return (contentType != null && contentType.toLowerCase().startsWith("multipart/"));
}

while in org.apache.commons.fileupload.servlet.ServletFileU pload I have:

public static final boolean isMultipartContent(HttpServletRequest request) {
    if (!POST_METHOD.equalsIgnoreCase(request.getMethod() )) {
        return false;
    }
    return FileUploadBase.isMultipartContent(new ServletRequestContext(request));
}

Is not a thing of vital importance, in fact just use the POST method intead of PUT works.. But I want to undertand why PUT is not taken into account!

Thank you for any reply Marco

Blessing

This question is similar and shows a way of handling both POST and PUT methods: File Upload via HTTP PUT Request – Inverter

Answer 1

RFC said

http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.6

The URI in a POST request identifies the resource that will handle the enclosed entity. That resource might be a data-accepting process, a gateway to some other protocol, or a separate entity that accepts annotations. In contrast, the URI in a PUT request identifies the entity enclosed with the request -- the user agent knows what URI is intended and the server MUST NOT attempt to apply the request to some other resource.

So PUT request represent a single resource.
But multiparts means multiple resources in a single body.

http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html

In the case of multiple part messages, in which one or more different sets of data are combined in a single body, a "multipart" Content-Type field must appear in the entity's header. The body must then contain one or more "body parts," each preceded by an encapsulation boundary, and the last one followed by a closing boundary.

Therefore by semantic of PUT request doesn't match with multipart data. And the POST is matched because requested URI of POST request is "handler of enclosed entities".

Sardou

Answer 2

PUT refers to a single resource, for example one file. So, by definition, a multi-part form doesn't match the PUT verb.

So I guess they made these checks for POST to be able to apply to the HTTP specs: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html

I guess you could argue that PUTting a custom object that contains multiple fields, including one or more files, should be ok, it could still be considered as being one resource in REST terms, but this is not the way most implementers seem to interpret this.

Chiliad

Is this the reason why I am receiving an empty ModelAttribute in my put request in spring? – Imco