What is the best way to store user settings for a .NET application?
Asked Answered
S

8

66

I have a .NET 2.0 Windows Forms application. Where is the best place the store user settings (considering Windows guidelines)?

Some people pointed to Application.LocalUserAppDataPath. However, that creates a folder structure like:

C:\Documents and Settings\user_name\Local Settings\Application Data\company_name\product_name\product_version\

If I release version 1 of my application and store an XML file there, then release version 2, that would change to a different folder, right? I'd prefer to have a single folder, per user, to store settings, regardless of the application version. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Subvert answered 25/8, 2008 at 16:43 Comment(2)
I think this article covers the solution.Ophthalmia
Updated link from Jorges comment.Ogdon
B
90

I love using the built-in Application Settings. Then you have built in support for using the settings designer if you want at design-time, or at runtime to use:

// read setting
string setting1 = (string)Settings.Default["MySetting1"];
// save setting
Settings.Default["MySetting2"] = "My Setting Value";

// you can force a save with
Properties.Settings.Default.Save();

It does store the settings in a similar folder structure as you describe (with the version in the path). However, with a simple call to:

Properties.Settings.Default.Upgrade(); 

The app will pull all previous versions settings in to save in.

Barden answered 25/8, 2008 at 16:59 Comment(9)
the only annoying thing about Settings.Default is that you need to create them manually beforehand, unlike NSUserDefaults in Cocoa that returns nil if a setting does not exist.Condescending
Which namespace is this in? I don't seem to have access to a Settings object in my .NET 4 winforms app.Bespectacled
Properties.Settings.DefaultUrson
Ryan Farley. How to use the above settings in multi user environmentBroomfield
@Broomfield the settings are stored in a user specific folder, so each user in a multiuser environment will have their own settings file based on their own user environment. Unless you're asking how to have them share settings, can't do that.Barden
@RyanFarley you know how to use application settings in multi user environmentBroomfield
Please add Properties.Settings.Default.Save(); to your answer to save users' time.Acth
This is surely great, but if I have to save something like tasks from a tasklist, I like to create a file for each task with its values. The fact that you have to set the settings beforehand, makes it annoying to use settings which store lists. I always struggle with that and that's why I use the file based method for such things. I could also just create one really long string and save it as a setting, but for this I had to use some separators, which are always a problem, because the user could use this in the input (if you don't prevent it).Assembled
VisualStudio generates an object for each settings entry. So in the example above, var setting1 = Properties.Settings.Default.MySetting1 would provide a compile time check for the correct variable name and omit the cast (since the auto generated object contains a get method with a cast). Set it with Properties.Settings.Default.MySetting1 = "MyValue".Lakh
C
9

.NET applications have a built-in settings mechanism that is easy to use. The problem with it, in my opinion, is that it stores those settings off into a rather obscure directory and end users will not be able to find it. Moreover, just switching from debug to release build changes the location of this directory, meaning that any settings saved in one configuration are lost in the other.

For these and other reasons, I came up with my own settings code for Windows Forms. It's not quite as slick as the one that comes with .NET, but it's more flexible, and I use it all the time.

Chloroform answered 21/3, 2011 at 15:0 Comment(0)
A
5

Or write your settings in a xml file and save it using Isolated Storage. Depending on the store you use it saves it in the Application Data folder. You can also choose a roaming enabled store which means when the user logs on a different computer the settings move with them.

Acanthus answered 25/8, 2008 at 17:11 Comment(0)
M
2

One approach that has worked for me in the past has been to create a settings class and use XML serialization to write it to the file system. You could extend this concept by creating a collection of settings objects and serializing it. You would have all of your settings for all users in one place without having to worry about managing the file system.

Before anyone gives me any flak for partially re-inventing the wheel, let me say a few things. For one, it is only a few lines of code to serialize and write the file. Secondly, if you have an object that contains your settings, you don't have to make multiple calls to the appSettings object when you load your app. And lastly, it is very easy to add items that represent your applications state, thereby allowing you to resume a long-running task when the application loads next.

Morphosis answered 25/8, 2008 at 17:6 Comment(1)
If you're willing to build custom XML serialization, why not serialize it into a single application setting? That way you get to use the app settings infrastructure. Create a serializable class or type converter and then import the class using the app settings dialog.Beatup
I
1

I try some methods to store my settings to simply text file and i found best way:

file stored in application folder, to usage , settings.txt: (inside settings file approved comments, try //comment)

//to get settings value

Settings.Get("name", "Ivan");

//to set settings value

Settings.Set("name", "John");

using:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows.Forms;

//you can store also with section name, to use just add name section Set(section_name,name,value) and Get(section_name,name,value)

public static class Settings
{
    private static string SECTION =  typeof(Settings).Namespace;//"SETTINGS";
    private static string settingsPath = Application.StartupPath.ToString() + "\\settings.txt";
    [DllImport("kernel32")]
    private static extern long WritePrivateProfileString(string section, string key, string val, string filePath);
    [DllImport("kernel32")]
    private static extern int GetPrivateProfileString(string section, string key, string def, StringBuilder retVal, int size, string filePath);
    public static String GetString(String name)
    {
        StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder(255);
        int i = GetPrivateProfileString(SECTION,name,"",temp,255,settingsPath);
        return temp.ToString();
    }
    public static String Get(String name, String defVal)
    {
        return Get(SECTION,name,defVal);
    }
    public static String Get(string _SECTION, String name, String defVal)
    {
        StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder(255);
        int i = GetPrivateProfileString(_SECTION, name, "", temp, 255, settingsPath);
        return temp.ToString();
    }
    public static Boolean Get(String name, Boolean defVal)
    {
        return Get(SECTION, name, defVal);
    }
    public static Boolean Get(string _SECTION, String name, Boolean defVal)
    {
        StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder(255);
        int i = GetPrivateProfileString(_SECTION,name,"",temp,255,settingsPath);
        bool retval=false;
        if (bool.TryParse(temp.ToString(),out retval))
        {
            return retval;
        } else
        {
            return retval;
        }
    }
    public static int Get(String name, int defVal)
    {
        return Get(SECTION, name, defVal);
    }
    public static int Get(string _SECTION, String name, int defVal)
    {
        StringBuilder temp = new StringBuilder(255);
        int i = GetPrivateProfileString(SECTION,name,"",temp,255,settingsPath);
        int retval=0;
        if (int.TryParse(temp.ToString(),out retval))
        {
            return retval;
        } else
        {
            return retval;
        }
    }
    public static void Set(String name, String val)
    {
        Set(SECTION, name,val);
    }
    public static void Set(string _SECTION, String name, String val)
    {
        WritePrivateProfileString(_SECTION, name, val, settingsPath);
    }
    public static void Set(String name, Boolean val)
    {
        Set(SECTION, name, val);
    }
    public static void Set(string _SECTION, String name, Boolean val)
    {
        WritePrivateProfileString(_SECTION, name, val.ToString(), settingsPath);
    }
    public static void Set(String name, int val)
    {
        Set(SECTION, name, val);
    }
    public static void Set(string _SECTION,String name, int val)
    {
        WritePrivateProfileString(SECTION, name, val.ToString(), settingsPath);
    }
}
Infracostal answered 25/6, 2015 at 8:2 Comment(0)
S
0

Settings are standard key-value pairs (string-string). I could wrap them in an XML file, if that helps.

I'd rather use the file system instead of the registry. It seems to be easier to maintain. In support scenarios, if the user needs to manually open/change the settings, that would be easier if it's in the file system.

Subvert answered 25/8, 2008 at 16:48 Comment(0)
N
0

I'd go down the folder list you posted except for the product version. You don't want the settings reset after an update is released.

I'm actually moving away from the registry for user settings because of the debug/footprint factor. I'm currently only storing a few basic settings (window size, position, version of a data file) in the registry, and I've run into more problems if an update goes bad or a user loses a second monitor and that is where the application was opening to. A few of them are savvy enough to understand regedit, but for the rest they have to do a reinstall, which is quick, but I think they grumble a bit. With the file based version, all I'd have to do is have them open up an XML file in Notepad and make a quick tweak.

In addition, I'm looking to make my application runnable off a USB flash drive, and having the settings tied into the file seems much friendlier to that process. I'm sure I can do some code to check/clean the registry, but I think most of us are already tired of the registry clutter that seems to eat up our machines nowadays.

I know there are some security tradeoffs to this, but none of the data I'm sorting is that critical to that cause, and I'm not suffering any performance hits due to the size of the application.

Nesmith answered 25/8, 2008 at 16:50 Comment(0)
T
0

Isolated storage is primarily used for applications distributed using ClickOnce and are run in a secure sandbox. The base path is decided for you and you won't be able infer it in your code. The path will be something like "\LocalSettings\ApplicationData\IsolatedStorage\ejwnwe.302\kfiwemqi.owx\url.asdaiojwejoieajae....", not all that friendly. Your storage space is also limited.

Ryan Farley has it right.

Tippett answered 25/8, 2008 at 21:45 Comment(0)

© 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.