An hour ago I posted an answer here which according to me was correct. However my answer was downvoted by Martin B. He said
You're just lucky and are getting zeros because the memory that i was placed in happened to be zero-initialized. This is not guaranteed by the standard.
However after reading Michael Burr's answer here and trying the following sample code
1)
#include <cassert>
struct B { ~B(); int m; };
int main()
{
B * b = new B();
assert(b->m == 0);
}
I got a debug error on MSVC++ 2010.
I got a similar error when I tried the following code [My answer here] on MSVC++2010
2)
#include <cassert>
struct Struct {
std::string String;
int Int;
bool k;
// add add add
};
struct InStruct : Struct
{
InStruct() : Struct() {}
};
int main()
{
InStruct i;
assert(i.k == 0);
}
Neither (1) nor (2) gave any such error on gcc/Clang which made me think if MSVC++2010 does not support C++03. I am not sure.
According to Michael Burr's post [in C++03]
new B() - value-initializes B which zero-initializes all fields since its default ctor is compiler generated as opposed to user-defined.
The Standard says
To value-initialize an object of type Tmeans:
— if T is a class type (clause 9) with a user-declared constructor (12.1), then the default constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if Thas no accessible default constructor);
.....
otherwise, the object is zero-initialized
From the first point if there is no user declared default constructor the compiler synthesized default constructor will be called which will zero initialize all the fields (according to last point).
So where am I wrong? Is my interpretation of value initialization correct?
:)– Frolicsome