A question asks: find the hamming distance of the following code:
11111
10101
01010
11100
00011
11001
The answer is 2. How does this work? I thought hamming distance is only between two strings?
A question asks: find the hamming distance of the following code:
11111
10101
01010
11100
00011
11001
The answer is 2. How does this work? I thought hamming distance is only between two strings?
The Hamming distance of a code is defined as the minimum distance between any 2 codewords. So, in your case, finding the Hamming distance between any 2 of the listed codewords, no one is less than 2.
Here is some Python-code to find it automatically:
code = [
(0,0,0,0,0,0),
(0,0,1,0,0,1),
(0,1,0,0,1,0),
(0,1,1,0,1,1),
(1,0,0,1,0,0),
(1,0,1,1,0,1),
(1,1,0,1,1,0),
(1,1,1,1,1,1)]
def hammingDistance(a, b):
distance = 0
for i in xrange(len(a)):
distance += a[i]^b[i]
return distance
def minHammingDistance(code):
minHammingDistance = len(code[0])
for a in code:
for b in code:
if a != b:
tmp = hammingDistance(a, b)
if tmp < minHammingDistance:
minHammingDistance = tmp
return minHammingDistance
print("min Hamming distance: %i" % minHammingDistance(code))
We have a theorem that d_min=weight(sum(all codes)); weight is the number of non zeros in the result string . In your example modulo add all string codes like first column of all and second....... then we get code as [ 0 0 1 1 0 ], weight of this is 2 ( no. of non zeros), i.e the minimum distance of hamming code
0000
, 1000
and 1110
the minimum hamming distance is obviously 1
but your calculation would return 2
(the xor-sum is 0110
) –
Hamster © 2022 - 2024 — McMap. All rights reserved.